Efficacy of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With Heart Failure and Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) constitute a substantial clinical burden with limited therapeutic options. While sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are established therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, their efficacy and safety profile in HFmrEF and HFpEF warrant comprehensive synthesis. Objective: To systematically evaluate the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, functional capacity, quality of life, and safety in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF. Methods: Eligible studies compared SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo or standard care in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 40%. The primary outcome was defined as CV adverse events, primarily including the composite of first hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or CV mortality (CV death), first HHF, CV death, all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, 6-minute walk test distance (6MWTD), and echocardiographic parameters. Results: Eighteen randomized controlled trials comprising 18 774 patients (SGLT2 inhibitors group: 9564; control group: 9210) were included. Meta-analysis showed that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of the primary composite endpoint (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.66-0.75, P < 0.00001) and HHF (OR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.64-0.74; P < 0.00001). However, reductions in CV death (HR: 0.92; 95% CI 0.84-1.00; P = 0.05) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.92; 95% CI 0.84-1.02; P = 0.10) did not reach statistical significance. Subgroup analyses indicated consistent benefits across New York Heart Association classes, body mass index, and concomitant mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists use, with pronounced efficacy observed in patients with renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m²). Furthermore, SGLT2 inhibitors significantly improved KCCQ-total symptom score, 6MWTD, E / e ' ratio. Conclusion: SGLT2 inhibitors effectively improve the risk of composite CV death and HHF in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF, while concurrently improving functional status and quality of life. These findings support the use of SGLT2 inhibitors as a foundational therapy for these populations, although their independent effect on mortality endpoints requires further elucidation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Pharmacotherapy
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280261447498
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With Heart Failure and Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Tingyu Wang, Tingfen Wang, Runfeng Zhang
Annals of Pharmacotherapy
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Efficacy of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With Heart Failure and Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Tingyu Wang, Tingfen Wang, Runfeng Zhang
article en

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) constitute a substantial clinical burden with limited therapeutic options. While sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are established therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, their efficacy and safety profile in HFmrEF and HFpEF warrant comprehensive synthesis. Objective: To systematically evaluate the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, functional capacity, quality of life, and safety in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF. Methods: Eligible studies compared SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo or standard care in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 40%. The primary outcome was defined as CV adverse events, primarily including the composite of first hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or CV mortality (CV death), first HHF, CV death, all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, 6-minute walk test distance (6MWTD), and echocardiographic parameters. Results: Eighteen randomized controlled trials comprising 18 774 patients (SGLT2 inhibitors group: 9564; control group: 9210) were included. Meta-analysis showed that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of the primary composite endpoint (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.66-0.75, P < 0.00001) and HHF (OR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.64-0.74; P < 0.00001). However, reductions in CV death (HR: 0.92; 95% CI 0.84-1.00; P = 0.05) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.92; 95% CI 0.84-1.02; P = 0.10) did not reach statistical significance. Subgroup analyses indicated consistent benefits across New York Heart Association classes, body mass index, and concomitant mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists use, with pronounced efficacy observed in patients with renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m²). Furthermore, SGLT2 inhibitors significantly improved KCCQ-total symptom score, 6MWTD, E / e ' ratio. Conclusion: SGLT2 inhibitors effectively improve the risk of composite CV death and HHF in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF, while concurrently improving functional status and quality of life. These findings support the use of SGLT2 inhibitors as a foundational therapy for these populations, although their independent effect on mortality endpoints requires further elucidation.

Annals of Pharmacotherapy
Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University (CN), Sichuan Mianyang 404 Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.