Observational Indistinguishability: An Axiomatic Limit on Verification from Within a Bounded Perceptual Domain

We give an axiomatic account of one narrow claim: an observer with finite-resolution sensors cannot, from within its accessible domain, verify that its perceptions track an external reality rather than a perceptually complete rendering of one. We formalize an observer as sensor channels, resolution thresholds, a temporal rate, and an accessible state domain, and define a rendering to be perceptually complete when its error lies everywhere below the observer's detection thresholds. Under a deterministic-readout idealization, three near-immediate results follow: no admissible procedure distinguishes a perceptually complete rendering from reality; no finite aggregation of such observations does either; and, for a single observer under irreversible action, any distinguishing procedure requires leaving the accessible domain, which by definition dissolves the observer. We then give the stochastic generalization that real, noisy sensors demand: distinguishability is governed by the statistical distance between the induced observation distributions and the sample budget (Neyman–Pearson, Chernoff–Stein), so the limit relocates from the single-shot threshold to the best attainable resolution, and no further. We separate verification (a sound internal certification) from knowledge (which, on reliabilist semantics, a veridical observer may possess without being able to verify it); the thesis is therefore not skeptical. We situate the framework against Cartesian skepticism, Putnam's semantic externalism, Quine–Duhem underdetermination, Moorean and contextualist anti-skepticism, Bostrom's simulation argument, Chalmers' virtual realism, the information-theoretic data-processing inequality and Blackwell sufficiency, and — on the physical side — the detectability results of Beane–Davoudi–Savage and the quantum floor on resolution (Heisenberg), together with the Bell constraint on what a complete rendering of a quantum observer must reproduce, answering the strongest objection from each. The defensible residue is modest: verification-from-within is bounded by the observer's best attainable resolution. Whether perceptually complete renderings must always hide a discrepancy — the Hidden-Discrepancy Schema — is presented honestly as proto-formal and left open, with three documented obstructions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20479777
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Observational Indistinguishability: An Axiomatic Limit on Verification from Within a Bounded Perceptual Domain

Mizael Antonio Tovar Reyes
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
preprint

Observational Indistinguishability: An Axiomatic Limit on Verification from Within a Bounded Perceptual Domain

Mizael Antonio Tovar Reyes
preprint en

Abstract

We give an axiomatic account of one narrow claim: an observer with finite-resolution sensors cannot, from within its accessible domain, verify that its perceptions track an external reality rather than a perceptually complete rendering of one. We formalize an observer as sensor channels, resolution thresholds, a temporal rate, and an accessible state domain, and define a rendering to be perceptually complete when its error lies everywhere below the observer's detection thresholds. Under a deterministic-readout idealization, three near-immediate results follow: no admissible procedure distinguishes a perceptually complete rendering from reality; no finite aggregation of such observations does either; and, for a single observer under irreversible action, any distinguishing procedure requires leaving the accessible domain, which by definition dissolves the observer. We then give the stochastic generalization that real, noisy sensors demand: distinguishability is governed by the statistical distance between the induced observation distributions and the sample budget (Neyman–Pearson, Chernoff–Stein), so the limit relocates from the single-shot threshold to the best attainable resolution, and no further. We separate verification (a sound internal certification) from knowledge (which, on reliabilist semantics, a veridical observer may possess without being able to verify it); the thesis is therefore not skeptical. We situate the framework against Cartesian skepticism, Putnam's semantic externalism, Quine–Duhem underdetermination, Moorean and contextualist anti-skepticism, Bostrom's simulation argument, Chalmers' virtual realism, the information-theoretic data-processing inequality and Blackwell sufficiency, and — on the physical side — the detectability results of Beane–Davoudi–Savage and the quantum floor on resolution (Heisenberg), together with the Bell constraint on what a complete rendering of a quantum observer must reproduce, answering the strongest objection from each. The defensible residue is modest: verification-from-within is bounded by the observer's best attainable resolution. Whether perceptually complete renderings must always hide a discrepancy — the Hidden-Discrepancy Schema — is presented honestly as proto-formal and left open, with three documented obstructions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.