Rapid-access arrhythmia care as an integrated model: A RE-AIM guided systematic review

OBJECTIVES: To synthesize clinical and operational evidence for rapid-access arrhythmia care (RAAC), identifying implementation enablers and barriers using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)- Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) and RE-AIM frameworks, and propose a reproducible workflow to support emergency department (ED) diversion and accelerated outpatient care. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a RE-AIM and CFIR-ERIC-guided systematic narrative review of rapid-access arrhythmia care models. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL from inception to October 10, 2025. Sixteen programs across the United Kingdom, Europe, Australia, Canada, and the United States were included after applying pre-specified eligibility criteria. Data were extracted on care models, clinical outcomes, and implementation determinants using a structured RE-AIM template, with CFIR-ERIC mapping used to identify actionable strategies. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 (randomized trials) and ROBINS-I (non-randomized studies). RESULTS: RAACs improved time to specialist assessment and reduced ED revisits and hospital admissions, amongst other effects. Most non-randomized studies had a moderate risk of bias, and these outcomes should be interpreted as directional rather than definitive. Key CFIR enablers included structured triage, EMR integration, leadership support, and multidisciplinary staffing. Common barriers included workforce fragility, diagnostic bottlenecks, digital and health literacy gaps, and limited long-term funding. Adoption was higher where inner-setting governance and outer-setting policy alignment were strong; maintenance was weakest where programs lacked formal integration into cardiac service networks. CONCLUSIONS: RAACs are feasible across diverse health-system contexts when supported by disciplined implementation. We propose a six-step acute workflow-Reach, Intake, Rapid Access, Multidisciplinary Workflow, Follow-up, and Maintenance-to guide implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Health
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2026.106340
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rapid-access arrhythmia care as an integrated model: A RE-AIM guided systematic review

Toluwalase Awoyemi, Ikenna Stanley Odoh, Linda Uzoma-Azoma, Lynda Odoh et al.
Public Health
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Rapid-access arrhythmia care as an integrated model: A RE-AIM guided systematic review

Toluwalase Awoyemi, Ikenna Stanley Odoh, Linda Uzoma-Azoma, Lynda Odoh, Chinenye Cynthia Odo, Nneoma Marygold Agbo
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To synthesize clinical and operational evidence for rapid-access arrhythmia care (RAAC), identifying implementation enablers and barriers using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)- Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) and RE-AIM frameworks, and propose a reproducible workflow to support emergency department (ED) diversion and accelerated outpatient care. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a RE-AIM and CFIR-ERIC-guided systematic narrative review of rapid-access arrhythmia care models. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL from inception to October 10, 2025. Sixteen programs across the United Kingdom, Europe, Australia, Canada, and the United States were included after applying pre-specified eligibility criteria. Data were extracted on care models, clinical outcomes, and implementation determinants using a structured RE-AIM template, with CFIR-ERIC mapping used to identify actionable strategies. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 (randomized trials) and ROBINS-I (non-randomized studies). RESULTS: RAACs improved time to specialist assessment and reduced ED revisits and hospital admissions, amongst other effects. Most non-randomized studies had a moderate risk of bias, and these outcomes should be interpreted as directional rather than definitive. Key CFIR enablers included structured triage, EMR integration, leadership support, and multidisciplinary staffing. Common barriers included workforce fragility, diagnostic bottlenecks, digital and health literacy gaps, and limited long-term funding. Adoption was higher where inner-setting governance and outer-setting policy alignment were strong; maintenance was weakest where programs lacked formal integration into cardiac service networks. CONCLUSIONS: RAACs are feasible across diverse health-system contexts when supported by disciplined implementation. We propose a six-step acute workflow-Reach, Intake, Rapid Access, Multidisciplinary Workflow, Follow-up, and Maintenance-to guide implementation.

Public HealthVol. 257
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Northwell Health (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Harvard University (US), NHS Lanarkshire (GB), Tameside Hospital (GB), Poughkeepsie Public Library District (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Wisconsin Division of Public Health (US), Mass General Brigham (US), East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.