Grow fast, fail slowly: <i>Un</i> trepreneurial ecosystems and the fast failure paradox

“Failing fast” features prominently in entrepreneurship discourse as a mechanism for reallocating resources and strengthening ecosystem resilience. However, existing research has yet to explain how entrepreneurs decide when to terminate an unviable venture, as failure studies remain focused on individual biases, while ecosystem studies largely overlook the early failure phase. Addressing this gap, this study examines how social, economic, and cultural dynamics within Amsterdam’s entrepreneurial ecosystem shape entrepreneurs’ decisions to discontinue their ventures. While stakeholders adopt a fast-failure rhetoric and entrepreneur-centred support framing to maintain legitimacy, their practices are driven by diverse institutional interests, thereby creating conditions that prolong failing ventures rather than enabling timely exit. These insights shift the locus of entrepreneurial failure from individual decision-making to systemic conditions and challenge the dominant view of ecosystems as entrepreneur-centric, showing instead that they primarily serve stakeholder interests, rendering them in effect Un trepreneurial ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426261449741
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grow fast, fail slowly: Un trepreneurial ecosystems and the fast failure paradox

Sarah Herzog, Dominic Chalmers, Maud van Merriënboer, Colin Mason
International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

Grow fast, fail slowly: Un trepreneurial ecosystems and the fast failure paradox

Sarah Herzog, Dominic Chalmers, Maud van Merriënboer, Colin Mason
article en

Abstract

“Failing fast” features prominently in entrepreneurship discourse as a mechanism for reallocating resources and strengthening ecosystem resilience. However, existing research has yet to explain how entrepreneurs decide when to terminate an unviable venture, as failure studies remain focused on individual biases, while ecosystem studies largely overlook the early failure phase. Addressing this gap, this study examines how social, economic, and cultural dynamics within Amsterdam’s entrepreneurial ecosystem shape entrepreneurs’ decisions to discontinue their ventures. While stakeholders adopt a fast-failure rhetoric and entrepreneur-centred support framing to maintain legitimacy, their practices are driven by diverse institutional interests, thereby creating conditions that prolong failing ventures rather than enabling timely exit. These insights shift the locus of entrepreneurial failure from individual decision-making to systemic conditions and challenge the dominant view of ecosystems as entrepreneur-centric, showing instead that they primarily serve stakeholder interests, rendering them in effect Un trepreneurial ecosystems.

International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship
Adam Smith Institute (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.