Impact of Simple Versus Complex Cannabis Advertising Messages and Warnings on US Young Adults’ Product Perceptions

Background: Despite cannabis’ increased popularity, limited research has assessed effects of advertising messages or warnings, particularly their complexity. This study examined effects of advertising message and warning complexity on young adults’ perceptions. Methods: In 2024, US adults ages 18 to 34 (n = 3581; 40.8% past-month cannabis use) completed an online survey-based experiment using a 2 × 3 factorial design (advertising message: simple vs complex; warning: none vs simple vs complex), then reported perceived addictiveness, harm, cautiousness, appeal, and interest (0 = none – 7 = extremely). Multivariable regression assessed conditions and their interactions with 1 another and past-month use in relation to perception outcomes. Results: Complex (vs simple) advertising message exposure was associated with higher perceived addictiveness ( B = 0.35, standard error [SE] = 0.06), harm ( B = 0.21, SE = 0.06), appeal ( B = 0.34, SE = 0.06), and interest ( B = 0.20, SE = 0.06). Complex (vs no) warning exposure was associated with higher addictiveness ( B = 0.23, SE = 0.08); simple or complex warning exposure was associated with higher harm ( B = 0.20, SE = 0.07; B = 0.20, SE = 0.08). A significant interaction indicated that complex advertising message exposure was associated with larger increases in addictiveness and harm among nonusers but minimal effect in users. In analysis stratified by past-month use, an interaction among users indicated that complex warning exposure was associated with higher addictiveness among those exposed to the simple advertising message but had the opposite effect in those exposed to the complex advertising message. Conclusions: Desired effects were yielded by complex advertising messages (interest, appeal) and warnings (risk). However, complex advertising messages may overpower effects of complex warnings among users. Additional research is needed to understand these dynamics and inform regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Substance Use &amp Addiction Journal
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342261454137
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Simple Versus Complex Cannabis Advertising Messages and Warnings on US Young Adults’ Product Perceptions

Cassidy R. LoParco, Yuxian Cui, Darcey M. McCready, Morgan Speer et al.
Substance Use &amp Addiction Journal
Media Influence and Health
article

Impact of Simple Versus Complex Cannabis Advertising Messages and Warnings on US Young Adults’ Product Perceptions

Cassidy R. LoParco, Yuxian Cui, Darcey M. McCready, Morgan Speer, Patricia A. Cavazos-Rehg, Shriya Thakkar, Carla J. Berg, Rishika Chakraborty
article en

Abstract

Background: Despite cannabis’ increased popularity, limited research has assessed effects of advertising messages or warnings, particularly their complexity. This study examined effects of advertising message and warning complexity on young adults’ perceptions. Methods: In 2024, US adults ages 18 to 34 (n = 3581; 40.8% past-month cannabis use) completed an online survey-based experiment using a 2 × 3 factorial design (advertising message: simple vs complex; warning: none vs simple vs complex), then reported perceived addictiveness, harm, cautiousness, appeal, and interest (0 = none – 7 = extremely). Multivariable regression assessed conditions and their interactions with 1 another and past-month use in relation to perception outcomes. Results: Complex (vs simple) advertising message exposure was associated with higher perceived addictiveness ( B = 0.35, standard error [SE] = 0.06), harm ( B = 0.21, SE = 0.06), appeal ( B = 0.34, SE = 0.06), and interest ( B = 0.20, SE = 0.06). Complex (vs no) warning exposure was associated with higher addictiveness ( B = 0.23, SE = 0.08); simple or complex warning exposure was associated with higher harm ( B = 0.20, SE = 0.07; B = 0.20, SE = 0.08). A significant interaction indicated that complex advertising message exposure was associated with larger increases in addictiveness and harm among nonusers but minimal effect in users. In analysis stratified by past-month use, an interaction among users indicated that complex warning exposure was associated with higher addictiveness among those exposed to the simple advertising message but had the opposite effect in those exposed to the complex advertising message. Conclusions: Desired effects were yielded by complex advertising messages (interest, appeal) and warnings (risk). However, complex advertising messages may overpower effects of complex warnings among users. Additional research is needed to understand these dynamics and inform regulations.

Substance Use &amp Addiction Journal
Milken Institute (US), George Washington University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US)
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Media Influence and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.