An Evidence-Based Master of Public Health Curriculum

OBJECTIVES: This evaluation describes an innovative approach to align a master of public health (MPH) core curriculum with the Evidence-Based Public Health (EBPH) framework and the 2016 revised Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) competencies. We describe implementation of revised core courses during the COVID-19 pandemic and student evaluation of the novel curriculum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Faculty mapped competencies to the EBPH framework, developed courses, and implemented the curriculum using a cohort model. For early cohorts enrolled from fall 2020 through summer 2021, faculty evaluated the effectiveness of the core courses, student satisfaction, and self-reported competency achievement through pre- and postcourse surveys starting in fall 2020. Additional qualitative insights were gathered from 6 focus groups (n = 50 students) and 10 interviews conducted in spring 2022. RESULTS: The redesigned curriculum launched in fall 2020 and emphasized an interdisciplinary approach that incorporated vital domains: health equity, community engagement, and the essential public health services. Survey findings indicated increased student self-efficacy and achievement of CEPH competencies. High retention and positive qualitative feedback underscored this curriculum's relevance for students with diverse backgrounds, including those who were new to public health, online learning, or US graduate education. Ongoing quality improvement and iterative curriculum refinement ensure that the evolving needs of public health practice are met. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The lessons learned through developing and implementing this evidence-based curriculum across delivery modes serve as an opportunity for other institutions aiming to enhance public health education in diverse student populations and address workforce needs. Applying this framework ensures that students attain the competencies required for the 21st-century public health workforce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Health Reports
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549261446616
Primary Topic
Public Health Policies and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Evidence-Based Master of Public Health Curriculum

Julie Preskitt, Molly Richardson, Kelley E. Swatzell, Greg Pavela et al.
Public Health Reports
Public Health Policies and Education
article

An Evidence-Based Master of Public Health Curriculum

Julie Preskitt, Molly Richardson, Kelley E. Swatzell, Greg Pavela, Lisa McCormick, Matthew Fifolt, Paul C. Erwin, Erika L. Austin, Anne E. Brisendine, Jessica T. Chambliss
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This evaluation describes an innovative approach to align a master of public health (MPH) core curriculum with the Evidence-Based Public Health (EBPH) framework and the 2016 revised Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) competencies. We describe implementation of revised core courses during the COVID-19 pandemic and student evaluation of the novel curriculum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Faculty mapped competencies to the EBPH framework, developed courses, and implemented the curriculum using a cohort model. For early cohorts enrolled from fall 2020 through summer 2021, faculty evaluated the effectiveness of the core courses, student satisfaction, and self-reported competency achievement through pre- and postcourse surveys starting in fall 2020. Additional qualitative insights were gathered from 6 focus groups (n = 50 students) and 10 interviews conducted in spring 2022. RESULTS: The redesigned curriculum launched in fall 2020 and emphasized an interdisciplinary approach that incorporated vital domains: health equity, community engagement, and the essential public health services. Survey findings indicated increased student self-efficacy and achievement of CEPH competencies. High retention and positive qualitative feedback underscored this curriculum's relevance for students with diverse backgrounds, including those who were new to public health, online learning, or US graduate education. Ongoing quality improvement and iterative curriculum refinement ensure that the evolving needs of public health practice are met. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The lessons learned through developing and implementing this evidence-based curriculum across delivery modes serve as an opportunity for other institutions aiming to enhance public health education in diverse student populations and address workforce needs. Applying this framework ensures that students attain the competencies required for the 21st-century public health workforce.

Public Health Reports
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Virginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine (US), Jacksonville State University (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Public Health Policies and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.