Meta-analysis of 633,317 individuals shows associations between healthy diets and depression, anxiety and stress in 23 low- and middle-income countries

BACKGROUND: Poor diet quality related to common mental disorders contribute to global health syndemics. However, there is no synthesis quantifying associations specifically in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC) where these concomitant health burdens are most prevalent. METHODS: We drew on a systematic Evidence and Gap Map (EGM) of > 3,000 records from Medline, CAB Global Health and PsycINFO (2000-2024). We selected LMIC studies quantifying healthy diets (validated dietary indices or factor-analytic methods) against validated screening measures of depression, anxiety, and stress, with a healthy versus unhealthy diet comparator. Effect sizes were standardised as mean differences from Hedges' g and pooled using three-level meta-analysis with robust variance estimation (RVE). Risk of bias was assessed, and sensitivity analyses showed robustness across study designs, dietary measures, and country income strata. RESULTS: Eighty-three eligible studies from 23 countries (depression n = 69; anxiety n = 43; stress n = 26), and 65 LMIC sample populations, reported statistical measures for 633,317 unique individuals. The Standardized Mean Differences (SMD) comparing healthy diets to unhealthy diets were -0.29 for depression (95% CI -0.35 to -0.23), -0.25 for anxiety (95% CI -0.35 to -0.16), and -0.24 for stress (95% CI -0.33 to -0.14). Results remained robust when restricted to low Risk of Bias studies. Findings were similar in direction and magnitude across study designs, dietary measurements, diagnostic tools, country income levels, and estimates adjusted for socio-economic status. Methodological limitations (e.g., cross-sectional design) and few studies from low-income countries created evidence gaps. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy diets were consistently associated with lower depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms in LMIC. These findings call for integrated dietary and mental health programming in LMIC (and in any setting with disproportionate health vulnerabilities), and for longitudinal and intervention research across diverse low-income settings beyond Iran and China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Global and Public Health
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-026-00283-w
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meta-analysis of 633,317 individuals shows associations between healthy diets and depression, anxiety and stress in 23 low- and middle-income countries

Bryan Cheng, Lisa M. Troy, Thalia M. Sparling, Suneetha Kadiyala et al.
BMC Global and Public Health
Nutritional Studies and Diet
article

Meta-analysis of 633,317 individuals shows associations between healthy diets and depression, anxiety and stress in 23 low- and middle-income countries

Bryan Cheng, Lisa M. Troy, Thalia M. Sparling, Suneetha Kadiyala, Cesar Cornejo
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poor diet quality related to common mental disorders contribute to global health syndemics. However, there is no synthesis quantifying associations specifically in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC) where these concomitant health burdens are most prevalent. METHODS: We drew on a systematic Evidence and Gap Map (EGM) of > 3,000 records from Medline, CAB Global Health and PsycINFO (2000-2024). We selected LMIC studies quantifying healthy diets (validated dietary indices or factor-analytic methods) against validated screening measures of depression, anxiety, and stress, with a healthy versus unhealthy diet comparator. Effect sizes were standardised as mean differences from Hedges' g and pooled using three-level meta-analysis with robust variance estimation (RVE). Risk of bias was assessed, and sensitivity analyses showed robustness across study designs, dietary measures, and country income strata. RESULTS: Eighty-three eligible studies from 23 countries (depression n = 69; anxiety n = 43; stress n = 26), and 65 LMIC sample populations, reported statistical measures for 633,317 unique individuals. The Standardized Mean Differences (SMD) comparing healthy diets to unhealthy diets were -0.29 for depression (95% CI -0.35 to -0.23), -0.25 for anxiety (95% CI -0.35 to -0.16), and -0.24 for stress (95% CI -0.33 to -0.14). Results remained robust when restricted to low Risk of Bias studies. Findings were similar in direction and magnitude across study designs, dietary measurements, diagnostic tools, country income levels, and estimates adjusted for socio-economic status. Methodological limitations (e.g., cross-sectional design) and few studies from low-income countries created evidence gaps. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy diets were consistently associated with lower depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms in LMIC. These findings call for integrated dietary and mental health programming in LMIC (and in any setting with disproportionate health vulnerabilities), and for longitudinal and intervention research across diverse low-income settings beyond Iran and China.

BMC Global and Public HealthVol. 4(1)
University of London (GB), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Columbia University (US)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Innovative Methods and Metrics for Agriculture and Nutrition Actions, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.