Effect of blinking on the measurement of tear evaporation rate

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and agreement of tear film evaporation measurements under different blinking conditions. METHODS: Ninety-six healthy volunteers (96 eyes) were recruited. Tear evaporation was measured using the Eye Vapometer under four randomized conditions: no-blinking, natural blinking, controlled blinking (one blink every 3 s), and eyes-closed. Raw evaporation rates were recorded in three consecutive measurements for each condition. Tear evaporation rates (TER) were calculated by subtracting the raw evaporation rate with eyes-closed from the other three conditions. Reliability of raw measurements were assessed, and agreement between TER values was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: Consecutive measurements taken under the no-blinking condition showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.04). The repeatability values for no-blinking, natural blinking, controlled blinking and eyes-closed were 56.12, 44.78, 42.46 and 22.32, respectively. The no-blinking condition provided significantly higher TER values than natural blinking (p < 0.001) and controlled blinking (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Blinking affects the reliability of evaporation measurement, with the least reliable condition being no-blinking. TER under the natural blinking condition shows good reliability and best represents physiological function during daily activities; therefore, it appears to be the most appropriate condition for TER evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2026.102670
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of blinking on the measurement of tear evaporation rate

Alberto López‐de la Rosa, Elena Martínez-Plaza, Cristina Arroyo-del Arroyo, Lorena Sánchez-Miguel et al.
Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
article

Effect of blinking on the measurement of tear evaporation rate

Alberto López‐de la Rosa, Elena Martínez-Plaza, Cristina Arroyo-del Arroyo, Lorena Sánchez-Miguel, María J. González-García
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and agreement of tear film evaporation measurements under different blinking conditions. METHODS: Ninety-six healthy volunteers (96 eyes) were recruited. Tear evaporation was measured using the Eye Vapometer under four randomized conditions: no-blinking, natural blinking, controlled blinking (one blink every 3 s), and eyes-closed. Raw evaporation rates were recorded in three consecutive measurements for each condition. Tear evaporation rates (TER) were calculated by subtracting the raw evaporation rate with eyes-closed from the other three conditions. Reliability of raw measurements were assessed, and agreement between TER values was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: Consecutive measurements taken under the no-blinking condition showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.04). The repeatability values for no-blinking, natural blinking, controlled blinking and eyes-closed were 56.12, 44.78, 42.46 and 22.32, respectively. The no-blinking condition provided significantly higher TER values than natural blinking (p < 0.001) and controlled blinking (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Blinking affects the reliability of evaporation measurement, with the least reliable condition being no-blinking. TER under the natural blinking condition shows good reliability and best represents physiological function during daily activities; therefore, it appears to be the most appropriate condition for TER evaluation.

Contact Lens and Anterior EyeVol. 49(4)
Universidad de Valladolid (ES), Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (ES)
Junta de Castilla y León
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.