Assistive technology devices for enhancing sleep quality: a scoping review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sleep disturbances such as snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea impair sleep quality and overall health. Although standard assistive technology (AT) treatments-including CPAP, oral appliances, and light therapy-are widely used, they present limitations related to cost, comfort, side effects, and adherence. This scoping review aimed to map AT devices designed to improve sleep quality in adults. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted using the methodological framework proposed by Levac et al. and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) and Google Scholar were searched from inception to February 15, 2024. Studies involving adults (≥18 years) using AT devices to improve sleep quality were included. Data extracted included study characteristics and device types. RESULTS: = 16) most frequently studied. Devices were categorised into sensory modulation, airway support, and behavioural support. Sensory devices were generally low-cost and low in technological complexity, whereas airway support devices showed greater variability in cost, setup complexity, and adherence. Most studies were conducted in hospital or sleep laboratory settings and utilised short-term intervention protocols. Usability and required user engagement varied across device types. CONCLUSION: Sleep-related AT devices are diverse and potentially beneficial, but their usability and effectiveness vary. Personalised device selection based on individual needs and functional abilities is essential. Further research should evaluate real-world applicability and long-term usability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2026.2677765
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assistive technology devices for enhancing sleep quality: a scoping review

Seung Woo Hwangbo, Chang Dae Lee, Yun Chan Shin, Rachel Hinrichs et al.
Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
article

Assistive technology devices for enhancing sleep quality: a scoping review

Seung Woo Hwangbo, Chang Dae Lee, Yun Chan Shin, Rachel Hinrichs, Desiree Waldeck, Muad Hassan, Hayejin Kim, Alexis McGee, Tony Chase, Jaewon Kang, Melinda Kurrus, Megan Albright
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sleep disturbances such as snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea impair sleep quality and overall health. Although standard assistive technology (AT) treatments-including CPAP, oral appliances, and light therapy-are widely used, they present limitations related to cost, comfort, side effects, and adherence. This scoping review aimed to map AT devices designed to improve sleep quality in adults. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted using the methodological framework proposed by Levac et al. and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) and Google Scholar were searched from inception to February 15, 2024. Studies involving adults (≥18 years) using AT devices to improve sleep quality were included. Data extracted included study characteristics and device types. RESULTS: = 16) most frequently studied. Devices were categorised into sensory modulation, airway support, and behavioural support. Sensory devices were generally low-cost and low in technological complexity, whereas airway support devices showed greater variability in cost, setup complexity, and adherence. Most studies were conducted in hospital or sleep laboratory settings and utilised short-term intervention protocols. Usability and required user engagement varied across device types. CONCLUSION: Sleep-related AT devices are diverse and potentially beneficial, but their usability and effectiveness vary. Personalised device selection based on individual needs and functional abilities is essential. Further research should evaluate real-world applicability and long-term usability.

Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
Kessler Foundation (US), University of Florida (US), Indiana Library Federation (US), Indianapolis Public Library (US), Indiana University Indianapolis (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.