From Thinking to Practice and Back: A Conceptual View of Knowledge Development

Thinking is commonly understood as the reflection of objective reality in subjective consciousness. While this interpretation explains how knowledge arises, it does not fully explain how knowledge develops. This paper proposes a complementary view of practice as the reflection of subjective representations in objective reality through human action. Human beings act not directly on reality itself but according to their understanding of it. Through practice, subjective representations encounter objective reality and generate outcomes that either confirm existing views or reveal their limitations. Thinking and practice therefore form a unified mechanism of cognition. Repeated iterations of this mechanism refine subjective representations and gradually bring them into closer correspondence with objective reality. At the same time, knowledge development is not linear. Different individuals and communities may follow trajectories of different lengths and structures, while the interpretation of practical outcomes may lead not only to progress but also to alternative branches and temporary dead ends.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20475312
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Thinking to Practice and Back: A Conceptual View of Knowledge Development

Nataliia Ivanenko
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

From Thinking to Practice and Back: A Conceptual View of Knowledge Development

Nataliia Ivanenko
article en

Abstract

Thinking is commonly understood as the reflection of objective reality in subjective consciousness. While this interpretation explains how knowledge arises, it does not fully explain how knowledge develops. This paper proposes a complementary view of practice as the reflection of subjective representations in objective reality through human action. Human beings act not directly on reality itself but according to their understanding of it. Through practice, subjective representations encounter objective reality and generate outcomes that either confirm existing views or reveal their limitations. Thinking and practice therefore form a unified mechanism of cognition. Repeated iterations of this mechanism refine subjective representations and gradually bring them into closer correspondence with objective reality. At the same time, knowledge development is not linear. Different individuals and communities may follow trajectories of different lengths and structures, while the interpretation of practical outcomes may lead not only to progress but also to alternative branches and temporary dead ends.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
General Energy Institute of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (UA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Thinking to Practice and Back: A Conceptual View of Knowledge Development — Nataliia Ivanenko · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS