A Qualitative Typology of Chinese University EFL Learners' Responses to Self-Regulated Learning Reading Strategy Instruction

HRMARS - Self-regulated learning (SRL) has become a cornerstone of educational reform worldwide, yet how individual learners respond to SRL-based reading strategy instruction remains underexplored in Chinese higher education. This study employed typology-building qualitative content analysis to examine how first-year Chinese undergraduate EFL learners at a local university responded to a 12-week SRL reading strategy intervention targeting metacognitive and cognitive strategies. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 19 participants and analysed using Kluge's (2000) typology-building approach. The analysis yielded three qualitatively distinct learner profiles: Strategic Internalisers, who demonstrated deep understanding, consistent enactment, adaptive flexibility, and cross-contextual transfer; Selective Adopters, who valued and used strategies but in a narrower, task-dependent range; and Reactive Strategy Users, whose strategy use remained contingent and activated primarily when comprehension difficulties arose. These profiles illuminate the experiential diversity within a single instructional context and challenge the assumption that learners respond uniformly to SRL instruction. The findings suggest that effective strategy instruction must account for learner heterogeneity through differentiated scaffolding, peer modelling, and adaptive pedagogical designs. The study contributes a learner-centred typology that bridges the gap between aggregate policy mandates and localised classroom realities in centralised, exam-driven educational systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v16-i5/28384
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Qualitative Typology of Chinese University EFL Learners' Responses to Self-Regulated Learning Reading Strategy Instruction

Fangmin Sun
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

A Qualitative Typology of Chinese University EFL Learners' Responses to Self-Regulated Learning Reading Strategy Instruction

Fangmin Sun
article en

Abstract

HRMARS - Self-regulated learning (SRL) has become a cornerstone of educational reform worldwide, yet how individual learners respond to SRL-based reading strategy instruction remains underexplored in Chinese higher education. This study employed typology-building qualitative content analysis to examine how first-year Chinese undergraduate EFL learners at a local university responded to a 12-week SRL reading strategy intervention targeting metacognitive and cognitive strategies. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 19 participants and analysed using Kluge's (2000) typology-building approach. The analysis yielded three qualitatively distinct learner profiles: Strategic Internalisers, who demonstrated deep understanding, consistent enactment, adaptive flexibility, and cross-contextual transfer; Selective Adopters, who valued and used strategies but in a narrower, task-dependent range; and Reactive Strategy Users, whose strategy use remained contingent and activated primarily when comprehension difficulties arose. These profiles illuminate the experiential diversity within a single instructional context and challenge the assumption that learners respond uniformly to SRL instruction. The findings suggest that effective strategy instruction must account for learner heterogeneity through differentiated scaffolding, peer modelling, and adaptive pedagogical designs. The study contributes a learner-centred typology that bridges the gap between aggregate policy mandates and localised classroom realities in centralised, exam-driven educational systems.

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social SciencesVol. 16(5)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.