Human–AI Collaboration in Immersive Simulation–Enhanced Product Design: An Autoethnographic Comparison of Conventional and AI-Assisted Workflows

This study examines human–AI collaboration in immersive simulation–enhanced product design through an autoethnographic comparison of conventional and AI-assisted workflows. Using the conceptual design of an electric motorbike as a representative case, the author conducted two parallel design processes: one following a traditional human-centered approach and the other integrating AI-supported ideation through the Vizcom AI platform. In both workflows, SolidWorks was used for parametric modeling, and Unreal Engine served as an immersive simulation environment enabling high-fidelity visualization, interaction, and virtual evaluation under consistent conditions. The workflows were evaluated using a shared set of qualitative and semi-quantitative metrics, including design innovation, aesthetic coherence, functional usability, manufacturability, and cognitive load. Data were primarily derived from structured reflective journaling, documenting decision-making rationales, iteration cycles, and experiential differences between AI-assisted and non-AI processes. The comparative analysis reveals that AI support substantially accelerates early-stage ideation and increases formal diversity and visual novelty. However, AI-generated proposals frequently required human correction and contextual judgment to address usability and manufacturability constraints. The immersive simulation environment facilitated iterative assessment by enabling real-time evaluations of spatial, ergonomic, and interaction-based aspects across both workflows. Rather than positioning AI as a substitute for human expertise, the findings highlight a shift in the designer’s role toward curation, critical evaluation, and interpretive control. The study contributes a transparent, process-oriented framework for examining human–AI collaboration in product design, offering insights that are transferable to a broad range of smart and interactive product development contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21541/apjess.1737010
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human–AI Collaboration in Immersive Simulation–Enhanced Product Design: An Autoethnographic Comparison of Conventional and AI-Assisted Workflows

Hüseyin Özkal Özsoy
Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems
Design Education and Practice
article

Human–AI Collaboration in Immersive Simulation–Enhanced Product Design: An Autoethnographic Comparison of Conventional and AI-Assisted Workflows

Hüseyin Özkal Özsoy
article en

Abstract

This study examines human–AI collaboration in immersive simulation–enhanced product design through an autoethnographic comparison of conventional and AI-assisted workflows. Using the conceptual design of an electric motorbike as a representative case, the author conducted two parallel design processes: one following a traditional human-centered approach and the other integrating AI-supported ideation through the Vizcom AI platform. In both workflows, SolidWorks was used for parametric modeling, and Unreal Engine served as an immersive simulation environment enabling high-fidelity visualization, interaction, and virtual evaluation under consistent conditions. The workflows were evaluated using a shared set of qualitative and semi-quantitative metrics, including design innovation, aesthetic coherence, functional usability, manufacturability, and cognitive load. Data were primarily derived from structured reflective journaling, documenting decision-making rationales, iteration cycles, and experiential differences between AI-assisted and non-AI processes. The comparative analysis reveals that AI support substantially accelerates early-stage ideation and increases formal diversity and visual novelty. However, AI-generated proposals frequently required human correction and contextual judgment to address usability and manufacturability constraints. The immersive simulation environment facilitated iterative assessment by enabling real-time evaluations of spatial, ergonomic, and interaction-based aspects across both workflows. Rather than positioning AI as a substitute for human expertise, the findings highlight a shift in the designer’s role toward curation, critical evaluation, and interpretive control. The study contributes a transparent, process-oriented framework for examining human–AI collaboration in product design, offering insights that are transferable to a broad range of smart and interactive product development contexts.

Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart SystemsVol. 14(2)
Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi (TR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.