A Spatially Constrained <i>k</i> -means++ Approach for Multi-Disaster Regionalization in China
The spatial zoning of disaster-prone areas in mainland China presents a compelling yet complex challenge. Despite significant strides in disaster management and risk reduction, a comprehensive and region-specific disaster zoning that considers spatial contiguity remains largely unexplored. This study seeks to address this gap by applying and comparing four clustering methods: k -means, spatially constrained k -means, k -means++, and spatially constrained k -means++. These methods were evaluated based on their ability to categorize regions by the extent of areas affected by five major disaster types: floods, droughts, low temperatures, typhoons, and hailstorms. The spatially constrained k -means++ algorithm emerged as the most effective, as it addressed spatial discontinuity inherent in disaster zoning and mitigated the initial value problem linked to traditional k -means methods. Using this approach, mainland China was divided into four distinct disaster-prone clusters. Cluster 1, encompassing 25 provinces, exhibited a complex and overlapping hazard profile, while Clusters 2 and 3 (Hebei–Jilin–Xinjiang and Jiangxi–Hubei, respectively) reflected more specific regional disaster patterns. Hainan formed an independent cluster because of its unique typhoon dominance. These spatially coherent zoning results provide a robust foundation for developing differentiated disaster management strategies, from integrated approaches in multi-disaster regions to specialized interventions in areas facing dominant threats.
Authors
- Yv Zhang
- Longsheng Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6290-4123)
- Yi Tang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4374-6334)
Institutions
- Hebei University of Technology (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Disaster Research
- Published
- 2026-05-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2026.p0615
- Primary Topic
- Facility Location and Emergency Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00