Using short simulated video interactions to assess communication insight in dental undergraduate selection

Background and Aim:<br/>Effective communication is a core competency for dental professionals. Traditional Multiple Mini Interviews (MMIs) assess various competencies, but there are limited validated tools to specifically capture applicants’ insight into communication behaviour. We developed and implemented a novel video-based MMI station using short, scripted simulated interactions to assess candidates’ interpretive and reflective communication insight.<br/>Method:<br/>Two 90-second video scenarios were developed depicting dentist-parent interactions varying in communication quality (‘Good Communication’ and ‘Poor Communication’). After each video, candidates were asked one question: ‘If you were the patient in this interaction, what would your experience have been and what impact do you think it would have had on your future behaviour(s) as a dentist?’ The station was integrated into the Centre for Dentistry’s’ standard dental selection MMI process over two admissions rounds. Alongside scoring for reliability, we administered a candidate feedback questionnaire (anonymised, voluntary) to evaluate acceptability, clarity, perceived fairness, and realism of the station.<br/>Results<br/>Qualitative feedback suggests high perceived realism and value in assessing communication reasoning beyond clinical knowledge alone. Quantitative feedback items indicate candidates found the station clear and fair; early analysis also suggests differentiation in candidate responses aligning with overall MMI performance. Thematic analysis of open-ended responses revealed insights into candidates’ understanding of empathy, active listening, and shared decision-making.<br/>Conclusions:<br/>Video-based simulated interactions can enhance assessment of communication insight in the dental undergraduate selection process. This approach is practical to deliver, well received by candidates, and provides a clear, structured way to assess reflective communication skills that are directly relevant to professional practice.<br/>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Published
2026-05-29
Primary Topic
Medical Education and Admissions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using short simulated video interactions to assess communication insight in dental undergraduate selection

Jamie Toole, Neil Willey, Marc; id_orcid 0000-0002-6213-2960 Edwards, Lorna Dysart et al.
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Medical Education and Admissions
article

Using short simulated video interactions to assess communication insight in dental undergraduate selection

Jamie Toole, Neil Willey, Marc; id_orcid 0000-0002-6213-2960 Edwards, Lorna Dysart, Jenny Good, Amanda; id_orcid 0000-0002-5508-805X Willis
article en

Abstract

Background and Aim:<br/>Effective communication is a core competency for dental professionals. Traditional Multiple Mini Interviews (MMIs) assess various competencies, but there are limited validated tools to specifically capture applicants’ insight into communication behaviour. We developed and implemented a novel video-based MMI station using short, scripted simulated interactions to assess candidates’ interpretive and reflective communication insight.<br/>Method:<br/>Two 90-second video scenarios were developed depicting dentist-parent interactions varying in communication quality (‘Good Communication’ and ‘Poor Communication’). After each video, candidates were asked one question: ‘If you were the patient in this interaction, what would your experience have been and what impact do you think it would have had on your future behaviour(s) as a dentist?’ The station was integrated into the Centre for Dentistry’s’ standard dental selection MMI process over two admissions rounds. Alongside scoring for reliability, we administered a candidate feedback questionnaire (anonymised, voluntary) to evaluate acceptability, clarity, perceived fairness, and realism of the station.<br/>Results<br/>Qualitative feedback suggests high perceived realism and value in assessing communication reasoning beyond clinical knowledge alone. Quantitative feedback items indicate candidates found the station clear and fair; early analysis also suggests differentiation in candidate responses aligning with overall MMI performance. Thematic analysis of open-ended responses revealed insights into candidates’ understanding of empathy, active listening, and shared decision-making.<br/>Conclusions:<br/>Video-based simulated interactions can enhance assessment of communication insight in the dental undergraduate selection process. This approach is practical to deliver, well received by candidates, and provides a clear, structured way to assess reflective communication skills that are directly relevant to professional practice.<br/>

Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Medical Education and Admissions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using short simulated video interactions to assess communication insight in dental undergraduate selection — Jamie Toole, Neil Willey, et al. · Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS