A citizen-based assessment of European smart cites using a DP2 index

Despite the growing body of research on smart cities, existing studies tend to rely on objective indicators, often overlooking how citizens perceive the balance between key urban dimensions. To fill this gap, the present research analyzes the current development of 56 smart cities in Europe through a multidimensional assessment framework based on the non-compensatory Distance-Pena (DP2) method. While most assessments of smart cities use objective measures to gauge their performance, this research emphasizes citizens' viewpoints by assessing perceptions concerning the infrastructural and technological dimensions of smart cities within five categories, namely health and safety, mobility, activities, opportunities, and governance. The results identify four different types of cities based on their respective levels of structural and technological performances. In some cases, there is equal development on both fronts, while in others, there is unequal development, characterized by a strong presence in either one aspect or another. These patterns generate heterogeneous configurations of perceived smart city performance. The findings provide a descriptive typology of smart cities based on citizen perceptions and offer insights into how different dimensions of urban performance can be evaluated. This study adds to the conceptual knowledge of smart cities and provides practical value for policymakers designing smart city strategies that align with citizen-centric views.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-55659-7
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A citizen-based assessment of European smart cites using a DP2 index

Enrico Ivaldi, Andrea Ciacci, Tiziano Pavanini, Tommaso Filì
Scientific Reports
Smart Cities and Technologies
article

A citizen-based assessment of European smart cites using a DP2 index

Enrico Ivaldi, Andrea Ciacci, Tiziano Pavanini, Tommaso Filì
article en

Abstract

Despite the growing body of research on smart cities, existing studies tend to rely on objective indicators, often overlooking how citizens perceive the balance between key urban dimensions. To fill this gap, the present research analyzes the current development of 56 smart cities in Europe through a multidimensional assessment framework based on the non-compensatory Distance-Pena (DP2) method. While most assessments of smart cities use objective measures to gauge their performance, this research emphasizes citizens' viewpoints by assessing perceptions concerning the infrastructural and technological dimensions of smart cities within five categories, namely health and safety, mobility, activities, opportunities, and governance. The results identify four different types of cities based on their respective levels of structural and technological performances. In some cases, there is equal development on both fronts, while in others, there is unequal development, characterized by a strong presence in either one aspect or another. These patterns generate heterogeneous configurations of perceived smart city performance. The findings provide a descriptive typology of smart cities based on citizen perceptions and offer insights into how different dimensions of urban performance can be evaluated. This study adds to the conceptual knowledge of smart cities and provides practical value for policymakers designing smart city strategies that align with citizen-centric views.

Scientific Reports
IULM University (IT), University of Genoa (IT), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Smart Cities and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A citizen-based assessment of European smart cites using a DP2 index — Enrico Ivaldi, Andrea Ciacci, et al. · Scientific Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS