Navigating Paradoxes: United States– China Rivalry and Cooperation in Environmental Sustainability Through Multilateral Development Banks Projects in Southeast Asia

This study explores the role of geopolitical alignment in influencing the allocation of environmental sustainability projects by the World Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank in Southeast Asia, a region of critical geopolitical importance. Given the intensifying competition between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, the research examines whether countries aligned with either power or those employing hedging strategies receive preferential access to multilateral development banks funding. Using data from 2016 to 2023, χ 2 tests and Spearman’s rank correlation were applied to evaluate the relationship between geopolitical alignment and project funding distribution. The findings indicate no significant correlation between geopolitical positioning and the allocation of sustainability projects by either of the multilateral development banks. This suggests that, despite broader geopolitical tensions, both banks prioritise development objectives over political considerations, underscoring the potential for neutral cooperation in global environmental governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China Report
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455261450935
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Paradoxes: United States– China Rivalry and Cooperation in Environmental Sustainability Through Multilateral Development Banks Projects in Southeast Asia

Viktor Eszterhai, Péter Klemensits
China Report
International Development and Aid
article

Navigating Paradoxes: United States– China Rivalry and Cooperation in Environmental Sustainability Through Multilateral Development Banks Projects in Southeast Asia

Viktor Eszterhai, Péter Klemensits
article en

Abstract

This study explores the role of geopolitical alignment in influencing the allocation of environmental sustainability projects by the World Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank in Southeast Asia, a region of critical geopolitical importance. Given the intensifying competition between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, the research examines whether countries aligned with either power or those employing hedging strategies receive preferential access to multilateral development banks funding. Using data from 2016 to 2023, χ 2 tests and Spearman’s rank correlation were applied to evaluate the relationship between geopolitical alignment and project funding distribution. The findings indicate no significant correlation between geopolitical positioning and the allocation of sustainability projects by either of the multilateral development banks. This suggests that, despite broader geopolitical tensions, both banks prioritise development objectives over political considerations, underscoring the potential for neutral cooperation in global environmental governance.

China Report
Ludovika University of Public Service (HU), John von Neumann University (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.