Assessing the factors influencing the quality of pocket-conditioned 3D generative models

Structure-based drug discovery (SBDD) aims to identify novel molecules that bind to therapeutic protein targets. The vast chemical space and limitations of traditional approaches make this task challenging. Recent advances in AI-generative models, such as flow matching, can produce novel, pocket-conditioned molecular structures directly in three-dimensional space. However, most pocket conditioned models in the literature are trained on structures derived from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), which contains structures with varying quality and inconsistent annotation. Moreover, the PDB is enriched with cofactors and natural products, thereby poorly representing real world SBDD scenarios. The relatively limited number of ligand series within the same pockets also hinder the model's ability to learn protein-ligand interactions effectively. Here for the first time we report the results of training pocket-conditioned generative models on internal crystallography data from a large pharmaceutical company. We also investigate other key determinants of model performance, such as inclusion of hydrogens and pretraining on unconditional data. We evaluate how each factor affects the generative quality of the ligands across the diverse training settings. Our results provide practical guidelines for the development of more effective 3D generative models for SBDD and highlight key directions for future research toward reliable, pocket-aware molecular design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cheminformatics
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-026-01230-5
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the factors influencing the quality of pocket-conditioned 3D generative models

Alessandro Tibo, Ross Irwin, Helen Lai, Kunyu Wang et al.
Journal of Cheminformatics
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Assessing the factors influencing the quality of pocket-conditioned 3D generative models

Alessandro Tibo, Ross Irwin, Helen Lai, Kunyu Wang, Jon Paul Janet
article en

Abstract

Structure-based drug discovery (SBDD) aims to identify novel molecules that bind to therapeutic protein targets. The vast chemical space and limitations of traditional approaches make this task challenging. Recent advances in AI-generative models, such as flow matching, can produce novel, pocket-conditioned molecular structures directly in three-dimensional space. However, most pocket conditioned models in the literature are trained on structures derived from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), which contains structures with varying quality and inconsistent annotation. Moreover, the PDB is enriched with cofactors and natural products, thereby poorly representing real world SBDD scenarios. The relatively limited number of ligand series within the same pockets also hinder the model's ability to learn protein-ligand interactions effectively. Here for the first time we report the results of training pocket-conditioned generative models on internal crystallography data from a large pharmaceutical company. We also investigate other key determinants of model performance, such as inclusion of hydrogens and pretraining on unconditional data. We evaluate how each factor affects the generative quality of the ligands across the diverse training settings. Our results provide practical guidelines for the development of more effective 3D generative models for SBDD and highlight key directions for future research toward reliable, pocket-aware molecular design.

Journal of Cheminformatics
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB), AstraZeneca (Finland) (FI), AstraZeneca (Sweden) (SE), AstraZeneca (Germany) (DE), Chalmers University of Technology (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.