Parental mentalisation of climate change during parent–child climate conversations: A qualitative investigation

OBJECTIVES: To examine how parents mentalise climate change during parent-child climate conversations and clarify the relational processes through which such conversations may support regulation, meaning-making or escalation of distress. DESIGN: Qualitative cross-sectional study. METHODS: Forty-five Italian parents of at least one child aged 6-18 years participated in online semi-structured interviews. Eligible participants had discussed climate change with their child at least once in the last six months. Interviews explored how parents understood the child's climate-related thoughts and emotions, responded to dysregulation or rupture, handled uncertainty and conflicting information, interpreted social influences and discussed responsibility, action and future-oriented concerns. Data were analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: Four themes were generated. Theme 1, Mentalisation under climate threat, captured how parents identified children's climate-related imaginaries, contained affect and repaired non-mentalising shifts. Theme 2, Epistemic regulation in climate talk, concerned how parents evaluated climate claims, calibrated trust and handled uncertainty without false reassurance or catastrophic certainty. Theme 3, Climate talk in a wider social world, described how parents helped children think about denial, ridicule, peer belonging and moral outrage. Theme 4, Agency and future meaning in climate contexts, concerned how parents calibrated action, protected children from responsibility-saturated coping and responded to climate-shaped future thinking. CONCLUSIONS: Parent-child climate conversations function less as information exchange than as relational episodes in which affect regulation, epistemic trust, social meaning-making, and responsibility are negotiated. The findings support parental climate mentalising as a clinically relevant form of parental reflective functioning under ecological stress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.70083
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parental mentalisation of climate change during parent–child climate conversations: A qualitative investigation

Nicola Carone, Gianluca Cruciani, Jacopo Tracchegiani
Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Parental mentalisation of climate change during parent–child climate conversations: A qualitative investigation

Nicola Carone, Gianluca Cruciani, Jacopo Tracchegiani
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine how parents mentalise climate change during parent-child climate conversations and clarify the relational processes through which such conversations may support regulation, meaning-making or escalation of distress. DESIGN: Qualitative cross-sectional study. METHODS: Forty-five Italian parents of at least one child aged 6-18 years participated in online semi-structured interviews. Eligible participants had discussed climate change with their child at least once in the last six months. Interviews explored how parents understood the child's climate-related thoughts and emotions, responded to dysregulation or rupture, handled uncertainty and conflicting information, interpreted social influences and discussed responsibility, action and future-oriented concerns. Data were analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: Four themes were generated. Theme 1, Mentalisation under climate threat, captured how parents identified children's climate-related imaginaries, contained affect and repaired non-mentalising shifts. Theme 2, Epistemic regulation in climate talk, concerned how parents evaluated climate claims, calibrated trust and handled uncertainty without false reassurance or catastrophic certainty. Theme 3, Climate talk in a wider social world, described how parents helped children think about denial, ridicule, peer belonging and moral outrage. Theme 4, Agency and future meaning in climate contexts, concerned how parents calibrated action, protected children from responsibility-saturated coping and responded to climate-shaped future thinking. CONCLUSIONS: Parent-child climate conversations function less as information exchange than as relational episodes in which affect regulation, epistemic trust, social meaning-making, and responsibility are negotiated. The findings support parental climate mentalising as a clinically relevant form of parental reflective functioning under ecological stress.

Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Pavia (IT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.