Crisis of jealousy and despair: a theory of rising political polarization and why managers and business schools should care about it

This study offers a novel theory of political and affective polarization in America and their impacts on business. The authors’ theory pivots on the growing portion of Americans for whom the national social contract is broken. Many of these individuals experience strong emotional reactions to the broken social contract, including jealousy among some and despair among others. Political parties have strategically consolidated fundraising by stoking these emotions and essentially nationalizing elections. The authors maintain that the net result is rising political adjustment costs – a previously unexamined source of government failure – that prevents government from effectively restructuring the social contract. The result is a dynamic systems model that explains how businesses contribute to polarization and political adjustment costs, identifies five emerging challenges that they create for businesses, and explains why managers should work to address them. The authors develop an agenda for research and teaching about these issues in strategic management, both within the US and in countries with different institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strategic Management Review
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/smr-05-2023-0918
Primary Topic
Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crisis of jealousy and despair: a theory of rising political polarization and why managers and business schools should care about it

R. Michael Holmes Jr., Jackson Nickerson
Strategic Management Review
Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
article

Crisis of jealousy and despair: a theory of rising political polarization and why managers and business schools should care about it

R. Michael Holmes Jr., Jackson Nickerson
article en

Abstract

This study offers a novel theory of political and affective polarization in America and their impacts on business. The authors’ theory pivots on the growing portion of Americans for whom the national social contract is broken. Many of these individuals experience strong emotional reactions to the broken social contract, including jealousy among some and despair among others. Political parties have strategically consolidated fundraising by stoking these emotions and essentially nationalizing elections. The authors maintain that the net result is rising political adjustment costs – a previously unexamined source of government failure – that prevents government from effectively restructuring the social contract. The result is a dynamic systems model that explains how businesses contribute to polarization and political adjustment costs, identifies five emerging challenges that they create for businesses, and explains why managers should work to address them. The authors develop an agenda for research and teaching about these issues in strategic management, both within the US and in countries with different institutions.

Strategic Management Review
Florida A&M University - Florida State University College of Engineering (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.