Biosimilars of anti-VEGF agents in retinal diseases: a narrative review of regulatory, clinical, and pharmacoeconomic aspects

BACKGROUND: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are the cornerstone therapy for retinal vascular diseases including neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and retinal vein occlusion. With patent expirations of ranibizumab and aflibercept, biosimilars have emerged as cost-effective alternatives. However, vitreoretinal specialists require consolidated evidence on regulatory standards, clinical equivalence, and practical implementation strategies to guide evidence-based integration of biosimilars into clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a narrative review of regulatory documents from the FDA, EMA, and NMPA, as well as Phase III clinical trials, real-world studies, and pharmacoeconomic analyses of approved ophthalmic anti-VEGF biosimilars. Literature searches were performed across PubMed, Embase, and regulatory databases from 2015 to 2025. Studies were included if they reported regulatory approval pathways, clinical efficacy and safety data, interchangeability studies, or pharmacoeconomic evaluations of anti-VEGF biosimilars in retinal diseases. RESULTS: Regulatory frameworks demonstrate rigorous biosimilarity assessment through comprehensive analytical characterization, preclinical evaluation, and clinical trials. Pivotal Phase III studies confirm therapeutic equivalence of approved biosimilars (including ranibizumab-nuna and aflibercept-abzv) with comparable visual acuity outcomes, safety profiles, and immunogenicity to originator products. Real-world evidence for ranibizumab biosimilars supports comparable outcomes to originators, while evidence for aflibercept biosimilars remains preliminary and warrants continued pharmacovigilance. Pharmacoeconomic analyses demonstrate 20-40% cost reduction compared to originators, offering substantial healthcare savings and improved patient access. Key implementation considerations include extrapolation principles, switching protocols, and clinic workflow integration. CONCLUSIONS: Although real-world data for aflibercept biosimilars are currently limited, emerging evidence for ranibizumab biosimilars supports comparable outcomes. Approved anti-VEGF biosimilars represent safe, effective, and cost-saving alternatives for retinal diseases. With robust analytical and clinical evidence supporting biosimilarity, vitreoretinal specialists can confidently adopt these agents. Successful integration requires understanding of regulatory science, evidence-based switching protocols, and healthcare system collaborations to maximize patient benefits while maintaining treatment standards. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, broader implementation studies, and pharmacovigilance monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-026-00872-9
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biosimilars of anti-VEGF agents in retinal diseases: a narrative review of regulatory, clinical, and pharmacoeconomic aspects

Qiwei Fan, Lijun Huang, Yuan Zong
International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Biosimilars of anti-VEGF agents in retinal diseases: a narrative review of regulatory, clinical, and pharmacoeconomic aspects

Qiwei Fan, Lijun Huang, Yuan Zong
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are the cornerstone therapy for retinal vascular diseases including neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and retinal vein occlusion. With patent expirations of ranibizumab and aflibercept, biosimilars have emerged as cost-effective alternatives. However, vitreoretinal specialists require consolidated evidence on regulatory standards, clinical equivalence, and practical implementation strategies to guide evidence-based integration of biosimilars into clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a narrative review of regulatory documents from the FDA, EMA, and NMPA, as well as Phase III clinical trials, real-world studies, and pharmacoeconomic analyses of approved ophthalmic anti-VEGF biosimilars. Literature searches were performed across PubMed, Embase, and regulatory databases from 2015 to 2025. Studies were included if they reported regulatory approval pathways, clinical efficacy and safety data, interchangeability studies, or pharmacoeconomic evaluations of anti-VEGF biosimilars in retinal diseases. RESULTS: Regulatory frameworks demonstrate rigorous biosimilarity assessment through comprehensive analytical characterization, preclinical evaluation, and clinical trials. Pivotal Phase III studies confirm therapeutic equivalence of approved biosimilars (including ranibizumab-nuna and aflibercept-abzv) with comparable visual acuity outcomes, safety profiles, and immunogenicity to originator products. Real-world evidence for ranibizumab biosimilars supports comparable outcomes to originators, while evidence for aflibercept biosimilars remains preliminary and warrants continued pharmacovigilance. Pharmacoeconomic analyses demonstrate 20-40% cost reduction compared to originators, offering substantial healthcare savings and improved patient access. Key implementation considerations include extrapolation principles, switching protocols, and clinic workflow integration. CONCLUSIONS: Although real-world data for aflibercept biosimilars are currently limited, emerging evidence for ranibizumab biosimilars supports comparable outcomes. Approved anti-VEGF biosimilars represent safe, effective, and cost-saving alternatives for retinal diseases. With robust analytical and clinical evidence supporting biosimilarity, vitreoretinal specialists can confidently adopt these agents. Successful integration requires understanding of regulatory science, evidence-based switching protocols, and healthcare system collaborations to maximize patient benefits while maintaining treatment standards. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, broader implementation studies, and pharmacovigilance monitoring.

International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
Jinan University (CN), Zhongshan People's Hospital (CN), Guangzhou Development Zone Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University (CN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.