Nutritional Composition and Energy Evaluation of Fruit and Vegetable Waste for Livestock Feed Applications

ABSTRACT Urban management increasingly emphasizes the development of a circular economy, particularly as growing populations, increased consumption of packaged foods, and inadequate recycling practices make effective waste management essential. Converting agricultural waste into animal feed offers a cost‐effective and sustainable solution. This study evaluated two dewatering methods (heating: 2.8 MJ/kg; centrifugation: 0.6 MJ/kg) and four drying techniques (sun: 0 MJ/kg; oven: 5.2 MJ/kg; fluidized bed: 3.8 MJ/kg; freeze: 12.5 MJ/kg) for processing fruit and vegetable waste (FVW). Statistical analyses compared dry matter, energy, protein, and fat content. Results showed that centrifugation dewatering combined with oven drying (Bb) was most effective, requiring 5.8 MJ total energy input per kg wet waste while producing material with 17.6% dry matter, 15.15 MJ/kg gross energy, 6.02% crude protein, and 6.45% crude fat. On average across all methods, treated FVW contained 17.61% dry matter, 13.62 MJ/kg energy, 5.54% crude protein, and 11.41% crude fat. Sun drying required no external energy but demanded 3–5 days processing time and produced lower protein retention (5.72%). Freeze drying, despite highest nutrient preservation, required 12.5 MJ/kg—more than double the energy of oven drying. These findings suggest that properly collected and processed FVW can serve as a partial component of livestock feed, with Bb recommended for industrial application based on energy efficiency and nutritional quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heat Transfer
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.70287
Primary Topic
Food Drying and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nutritional Composition and Energy Evaluation of Fruit and Vegetable Waste for Livestock Feed Applications

Hossein Abdi‐Benemar, Tarahom Mesri Gundoshmian, Ali Roshanianfard, Zahra Atakeshizadeh et al.
Heat Transfer
Food Drying and Modeling
article

Nutritional Composition and Energy Evaluation of Fruit and Vegetable Waste for Livestock Feed Applications

Hossein Abdi‐Benemar, Tarahom Mesri Gundoshmian, Ali Roshanianfard, Zahra Atakeshizadeh, Amirhossein Afkari Sayah
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Urban management increasingly emphasizes the development of a circular economy, particularly as growing populations, increased consumption of packaged foods, and inadequate recycling practices make effective waste management essential. Converting agricultural waste into animal feed offers a cost‐effective and sustainable solution. This study evaluated two dewatering methods (heating: 2.8 MJ/kg; centrifugation: 0.6 MJ/kg) and four drying techniques (sun: 0 MJ/kg; oven: 5.2 MJ/kg; fluidized bed: 3.8 MJ/kg; freeze: 12.5 MJ/kg) for processing fruit and vegetable waste (FVW). Statistical analyses compared dry matter, energy, protein, and fat content. Results showed that centrifugation dewatering combined with oven drying (Bb) was most effective, requiring 5.8 MJ total energy input per kg wet waste while producing material with 17.6% dry matter, 15.15 MJ/kg gross energy, 6.02% crude protein, and 6.45% crude fat. On average across all methods, treated FVW contained 17.61% dry matter, 13.62 MJ/kg energy, 5.54% crude protein, and 11.41% crude fat. Sun drying required no external energy but demanded 3–5 days processing time and produced lower protein retention (5.72%). Freeze drying, despite highest nutrient preservation, required 12.5 MJ/kg—more than double the energy of oven drying. These findings suggest that properly collected and processed FVW can serve as a partial component of livestock feed, with Bb recommended for industrial application based on energy efficiency and nutritional quality.

Heat Transfer
University of Mohaghegh Ardabili (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Food Drying and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.