Lighting in intensive care units: A systematic review of patient outcomes and directions for future research

OBJECTIVES: Patients admitted to ICUs are frequently exposed to disrupted light-dark cycles due to limited daylight exposure and inappropriate electrical lighting in terms of intensity, duration, timing, and spectral distribution. Such disruptions can impair circadian entrainment, thereby negatively affecting patient outcomes. Consequently, lighting interventions have been proposed to optimise the ICU environment and patient outcomes, but guidance for ICU lighting design remains limited. This review aimed to synthesise research from the past 10 years, examining the impact of lighting conditions and interventions on health outcomes in ICU patients. METHODS: The review was registered in PROSPERO and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Six databases were searched for studies published between 2015 and 2026. Two independent reviewers applied inclusion and exclusion criteria, screened studies, and assessed methodological quality using established critical appraisal tools. RESULTS: A total of 12,674 studies were screened, and 28 studies met inclusion criteria. Of these, fourteen studies investigated lighting interventions and their effects on health outcomes, including dynamic lighting, static lighting, (bright) light therapy, and multicomponent lighting studies. The remaining studies investigated naturalistic lighting conditions through either comparisons of existing ICU lighting conditions or single observations. Studies showed high heterogeneity in findings, health outcomes assessed, and methodologies used to evaluate both lighting conditions and health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although some studies suggest potential benefits of specific lighting interventions, the limited evidence and inconsistent reporting of lighting conditions prevent definitive conclusions about their effects on health outcomes in ICU patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: While current research does not yet provide clear guidance for ICU lighting design or the use of lighting interventions, the field is advancing. Prioritising consistent and transparent lighting assessment, alongside multidisciplinary collaboration and larger clinical trials, will help generate the data needed to inform future practice and support the development of meaningful ICU lighting standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2026.104421
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lighting in intensive care units: A systematic review of patient outcomes and directions for future research

Veronica Garcia-Hansen, Oystein Tronstad, Iza K. Linders, Francisca Rodriguez et al.
Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Lighting in intensive care units: A systematic review of patient outcomes and directions for future research

Veronica Garcia-Hansen, Oystein Tronstad, Iza K. Linders, Francisca Rodriguez, Adrian Goldsworthy
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patients admitted to ICUs are frequently exposed to disrupted light-dark cycles due to limited daylight exposure and inappropriate electrical lighting in terms of intensity, duration, timing, and spectral distribution. Such disruptions can impair circadian entrainment, thereby negatively affecting patient outcomes. Consequently, lighting interventions have been proposed to optimise the ICU environment and patient outcomes, but guidance for ICU lighting design remains limited. This review aimed to synthesise research from the past 10 years, examining the impact of lighting conditions and interventions on health outcomes in ICU patients. METHODS: The review was registered in PROSPERO and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Six databases were searched for studies published between 2015 and 2026. Two independent reviewers applied inclusion and exclusion criteria, screened studies, and assessed methodological quality using established critical appraisal tools. RESULTS: A total of 12,674 studies were screened, and 28 studies met inclusion criteria. Of these, fourteen studies investigated lighting interventions and their effects on health outcomes, including dynamic lighting, static lighting, (bright) light therapy, and multicomponent lighting studies. The remaining studies investigated naturalistic lighting conditions through either comparisons of existing ICU lighting conditions or single observations. Studies showed high heterogeneity in findings, health outcomes assessed, and methodologies used to evaluate both lighting conditions and health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although some studies suggest potential benefits of specific lighting interventions, the limited evidence and inconsistent reporting of lighting conditions prevent definitive conclusions about their effects on health outcomes in ICU patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: While current research does not yet provide clear guidance for ICU lighting design or the use of lighting interventions, the field is advancing. Prioritising consistent and transparent lighting assessment, alongside multidisciplinary collaboration and larger clinical trials, will help generate the data needed to inform future practice and support the development of meaningful ICU lighting standards.

Intensive and Critical Care NursingVol. 96
The University of Queensland (AU), Prince Charles Hospital (AU), Human Computer Interaction (Switzerland) (CH)
Queensland University of Technology
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.