Rock Physics of the Critical Zone: Models, Inversion, and Interpretation

Abstract Rock physics models link geophysical measurements with subsurface petrophysical properties, such as porosity, mineral composition, and fluid saturation. While originally developed for hydrocarbon exploration, these models are increasingly applied in the near surface for quantitative interpretation of geophysical data. This review focuses on their application to the subsurface component of the critical zone, which extends from soil to the base of weathered bedrock and controls key hydrological, geomorphological, and ecological processes. Its structure and heterogeneity remain difficult to characterize due to limited direct subsurface observations. As a result, critical zone studies of the subsurface have relied on indirect geophysical measurements, which are spatially extensive and are used to interpret structural variations, property heterogeneity, and physical processes. However, geophysical measurements alone do not yield petrophysical properties. Rock physics models combined with geophysical inversion provide a tool to translate geophysical data into subsurface petrophysical properties. In this review, we present a synthesis of rock physics models for the prediction of geophysical properties of unsaturated and saturated porous media, focusing on their formulations and assumptions in near‐surface applications involving seismic, electrical, electromagnetic, and nuclear magnetic resonance methods. We then discuss their integration in geophysical inversion studies for the petrophysical characterization of the critical zone. We assess the capabilities, strengths, and limitations of rock physics models and inversion methods in critical zone applications, illustrated with case studies from the Southern Sierra and Laramie Range, and show how the resulting quantitative estimates of petrophysical properties inform hydrogeological studies and reduce uncertainty in model predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reviews of Geophysics
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025rg000912
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rock Physics of the Critical Zone: Models, Inversion, and Interpretation

Andrew D. Parsekian, Clifford S. Riebe, Brady A. Flinchum, Dario Grana et al.
Reviews of Geophysics
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
article

Rock Physics of the Critical Zone: Models, Inversion, and Interpretation

Andrew D. Parsekian, Clifford S. Riebe, Brady A. Flinchum, Dario Grana, Denys Grombacher, W. Steven Holbrook
article en

Abstract

Abstract Rock physics models link geophysical measurements with subsurface petrophysical properties, such as porosity, mineral composition, and fluid saturation. While originally developed for hydrocarbon exploration, these models are increasingly applied in the near surface for quantitative interpretation of geophysical data. This review focuses on their application to the subsurface component of the critical zone, which extends from soil to the base of weathered bedrock and controls key hydrological, geomorphological, and ecological processes. Its structure and heterogeneity remain difficult to characterize due to limited direct subsurface observations. As a result, critical zone studies of the subsurface have relied on indirect geophysical measurements, which are spatially extensive and are used to interpret structural variations, property heterogeneity, and physical processes. However, geophysical measurements alone do not yield petrophysical properties. Rock physics models combined with geophysical inversion provide a tool to translate geophysical data into subsurface petrophysical properties. In this review, we present a synthesis of rock physics models for the prediction of geophysical properties of unsaturated and saturated porous media, focusing on their formulations and assumptions in near‐surface applications involving seismic, electrical, electromagnetic, and nuclear magnetic resonance methods. We then discuss their integration in geophysical inversion studies for the petrophysical characterization of the critical zone. We assess the capabilities, strengths, and limitations of rock physics models and inversion methods in critical zone applications, illustrated with case studies from the Southern Sierra and Laramie Range, and show how the resulting quantitative estimates of petrophysical properties inform hydrogeological studies and reduce uncertainty in model predictions.

Reviews of GeophysicsVol. 64(2)
University of Wyoming (US), Aarhus University (DK), University of Newcastle Australia (AU), Virginia Tech (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.