Machine learning prediction of PICC-associated thrombotic complications in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are widely used vascular access devices in intensive care, yet thrombotic complications remain a significant clinical concern. Traditional risk assessment tools fail to capture the complex, non-linear interactions among thrombosis risk factors in critically ill patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study, conducted in adherence to TRIPOD + AI guidelines, developed and compared five machine learning models for predicting PICC-associated thrombotic complications using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. A total of 8,145 PICC insertions from 6,376 patients were analyzed, with 29 predictor variables spanning demographics, coagulation parameters, hematologic indices, renal function, vital signs, comorbidities, and treatment variables. Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) addressed class imbalance (16.88% event rate), applied exclusively to the training set after the train-test split. Hyperparameters were optimized via five-fold cross-validated grid search. RESULTS: Random Forest achieved the best discriminative performance (AUC-ROC 0.809, 95% CI: 0.780-0.838, bootstrap n = 2,000), significantly outperforming all other models on DeLong's test (all P < 0.01); its calibration slope of 1.369 indicated mild underconfidence. Decision curve analysis confirmed net clinical benefit for the three tree-based ensembles across threshold probabilities of approximately 1-50%. Feature importance analysis identified prior thrombosis history as the dominant predictor, followed by coagulation parameters and hematologic indices. Sensitivity analyses using patient-clustered data splitting, multiple imputation (m = 5, Rubin's rules), first-PICC-only subsets, and a no-prior-thrombosis subgroup confirmed the robustness of the primary findings. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the development of machine learning-based clinical decision support tools for individualized thrombosis risk stratification in critical care settings. The completed TRIPOD + AI checklist is provided as Additional file 1.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-026-03607-w
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning prediction of PICC-associated thrombotic complications in critically ill patients

王永杰, Yanfei Zhang, Yang Cui, Haitao Wu et al.
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Machine learning prediction of PICC-associated thrombotic complications in critically ill patients

王永杰, Yanfei Zhang, Yang Cui, Haitao Wu, Hailan Jiang, Liyan Xia, Jiahui Guo, Mengying Sun
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are widely used vascular access devices in intensive care, yet thrombotic complications remain a significant clinical concern. Traditional risk assessment tools fail to capture the complex, non-linear interactions among thrombosis risk factors in critically ill patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study, conducted in adherence to TRIPOD + AI guidelines, developed and compared five machine learning models for predicting PICC-associated thrombotic complications using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. A total of 8,145 PICC insertions from 6,376 patients were analyzed, with 29 predictor variables spanning demographics, coagulation parameters, hematologic indices, renal function, vital signs, comorbidities, and treatment variables. Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) addressed class imbalance (16.88% event rate), applied exclusively to the training set after the train-test split. Hyperparameters were optimized via five-fold cross-validated grid search. RESULTS: Random Forest achieved the best discriminative performance (AUC-ROC 0.809, 95% CI: 0.780-0.838, bootstrap n = 2,000), significantly outperforming all other models on DeLong's test (all P < 0.01); its calibration slope of 1.369 indicated mild underconfidence. Decision curve analysis confirmed net clinical benefit for the three tree-based ensembles across threshold probabilities of approximately 1-50%. Feature importance analysis identified prior thrombosis history as the dominant predictor, followed by coagulation parameters and hematologic indices. Sensitivity analyses using patient-clustered data splitting, multiple imputation (m = 5, Rubin's rules), first-PICC-only subsets, and a no-prior-thrombosis subgroup confirmed the robustness of the primary findings. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the development of machine learning-based clinical decision support tools for individualized thrombosis risk stratification in critical care settings. The completed TRIPOD + AI checklist is provided as Additional file 1.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Union Hospital (HK), Jilin University (CN), People 's Hospital of Jilin Province (CN), First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University (CN), New Hope Liuhe (China) (CN)
Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.