Early Versus Delayed Treatment with Ocrelizumab: A Multicenter, Real-World Observational Study in People with Multiple Sclerosis

INTRODUCTION: Growing evidence suggests that first-line (1L) treatment with high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (HE-DMTs) may have greater clinical benefit in multiple sclerosis (MS) than delaying HE-DMTs to second- or subsequent-line (2L+) therapy. However, MS treatment is often initiated using an escalation approach, involving initial treatment with low- to moderate-efficacy DMTs followed by escalation to HE-DMTs in the presence of new disease activity or disability worsening. Ocrelizumab is a HE-DMT approved for the treatment of relapsing and primary progressive MS, but real-world outcomes of ocrelizumab as a 1L vs 2L+ therapy are not well characterized. METHODS: Real-world data from people with MS (pwMS) receiving treatment at four centers in the USA were analyzed. The effectiveness of ocrelizumab when administered as 1L or 2L+ treatment was compared for up to 60 months in follow-up. The primary outcome was time to confirmed disability worsening (based on Patient-Determined Disease Steps [PDDS]). Secondary outcomes were time to requiring a walking aid (PDDS ≥ 4), annualized patient-reported relapse rate, and magnetic resonance imaging measures (e.g., brain volume and number and volume of new T2 lesions). RESULTS: A total of 403 pwMS (1L n = 309, 2L+ n = 94) were identified. Overall, pwMS who received 1L ocrelizumab experienced less confirmed disease worsening (25.8% vs 42.6%; P = 0.03) and requirement for a walking aid (6.5% vs 27.4%; P < 0.01) compared with the 2L+ cohort. The 1L group also had a significantly lower change in T2 lesion volume (mean difference - 0.797 mL; P < 0.05) and a lower risk of developing new T2 lesions than the 2L+ group (incidence rate ratio 0.88 [95% CI 0.78-0.99]; P = 0.04). Relapse rate and brain volume outcomes were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to the growing pool of evidence that 1L treatment with HE-DMTs such as ocrelizumab can improve clinical outcomes for pwMS compared with delaying HE-DMT to 2L+ .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurology and Therapy
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-026-00951-x
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Versus Delayed Treatment with Ocrelizumab: A Multicenter, Real-World Observational Study in People with Multiple Sclerosis

Daniel Ontaneda, Elmor D. Pineda, Gayatri Marathe, Kunio Nakamura et al.
Neurology and Therapy
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Early Versus Delayed Treatment with Ocrelizumab: A Multicenter, Real-World Observational Study in People with Multiple Sclerosis

Daniel Ontaneda, Elmor D. Pineda, Gayatri Marathe, Kunio Nakamura, M. Levesque-Leroux, Annie Guérin, Le H. Hua, E Alvarez, Hela Romdhani, Robert T. Naismith
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Growing evidence suggests that first-line (1L) treatment with high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (HE-DMTs) may have greater clinical benefit in multiple sclerosis (MS) than delaying HE-DMTs to second- or subsequent-line (2L+) therapy. However, MS treatment is often initiated using an escalation approach, involving initial treatment with low- to moderate-efficacy DMTs followed by escalation to HE-DMTs in the presence of new disease activity or disability worsening. Ocrelizumab is a HE-DMT approved for the treatment of relapsing and primary progressive MS, but real-world outcomes of ocrelizumab as a 1L vs 2L+ therapy are not well characterized. METHODS: Real-world data from people with MS (pwMS) receiving treatment at four centers in the USA were analyzed. The effectiveness of ocrelizumab when administered as 1L or 2L+ treatment was compared for up to 60 months in follow-up. The primary outcome was time to confirmed disability worsening (based on Patient-Determined Disease Steps [PDDS]). Secondary outcomes were time to requiring a walking aid (PDDS ≥ 4), annualized patient-reported relapse rate, and magnetic resonance imaging measures (e.g., brain volume and number and volume of new T2 lesions). RESULTS: A total of 403 pwMS (1L n = 309, 2L+ n = 94) were identified. Overall, pwMS who received 1L ocrelizumab experienced less confirmed disease worsening (25.8% vs 42.6%; P = 0.03) and requirement for a walking aid (6.5% vs 27.4%; P < 0.01) compared with the 2L+ cohort. The 1L group also had a significantly lower change in T2 lesion volume (mean difference - 0.797 mL; P < 0.05) and a lower risk of developing new T2 lesions than the 2L+ group (incidence rate ratio 0.88 [95% CI 0.78-0.99]; P = 0.04). Relapse rate and brain volume outcomes were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to the growing pool of evidence that 1L treatment with HE-DMTs such as ocrelizumab can improve clinical outcomes for pwMS compared with delaying HE-DMT to 2L+ .

Neurology and Therapy
Cleveland Clinic (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Lou Ruvo Brain Institute (US), Genesys (United States) (US), Alexion Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US), Group for Research in Decision Analysis (CA), Alexion Pharma (Switzerland) (CH), Atotech (United States) (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.