Champions and early adopters in an implementation-effectiveness study of shared decision making: implications for interpersonal strategies

BACKGROUND: Although recommended, shared decision making (SDM) is not widely adopted for primary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Champions may influence peer adoption if they are enthusiastic and skilled. We describe adoption of an SDM conversation aid for CV risk reduction (CV Prevention Choice) by champions and early adopters in a pragmatic implementation trial and consider their influence on uptake in clinics. METHODS: We embedded the SDM tool in the electronic health record in three U.S. health care systems. Eight of their 15 affiliated clinics deployed a champion implementation strategy. Adopters used the SDM tool in ≥ 2 routine clinical encounters. Superusers had ≥ 20 encounters. Penetration was the proportion of adopters among eligible clinicians. Adoption and penetration were assessed in the usual care (early adoption), active implementation, and maintenance implementation phases. Thematic analysis methods were used to analyze qualitative data from individual interviews and periodic reflections. RESULTS: Between May 2021 and January 2025, 37 interviews with clinicians and other staff and 65 periodic reflections were completed. Among 176 clinicians, 55% (n = 97) used CV Prevention Choice at least once and 42% (n = 76) adopted it. Champions and other opinion leaders gave presentations and demonstrated their practice, but targeted individual persuasion and group dialogue were less common, especially when champions appreciated peers' preferences. Champions used the tool more frequently (median = 93, IQR 53-150) than non-champions (median = 16, IQR 4-50), although only 4 of the top 20 users were champions. Clinics with champions had higher penetration rates (50% vs 29%) and lower rates of one-time tool use than clinics without champions (17% vs 33%). CONCLUSION: Champions, superusers, and other opinions leaders may influence peer adoption of clinical innovations by sharing their experience, but group discourse may be needed to build the case for uptake of innovations. Superusers may be impactful in clinics without formal champions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol described herein was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 22 June 2020 (No. NCT04450914).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Implementation Science Communications
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-026-00977-0
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Champions and early adopters in an implementation-effectiveness study of shared decision making: implications for interpersonal strategies

Charanjit Khurana, Jennifer L. Ridgeway, Megan E. Branda, Yvonne L. Gomez et al.
Implementation Science Communications
Behavioral Health and Interventions
article

Champions and early adopters in an implementation-effectiveness study of shared decision making: implications for interpersonal strategies

Charanjit Khurana, Jennifer L. Ridgeway, Megan E. Branda, Yvonne L. Gomez, Hooman Gharai, Ashlee Dagoberg, Derek L. Gravholt, Víctor M. Montori, Kelly Louks, Victor Montori, Shubhangi Bagewadi, Vivek Nautiyal, Hugh Jackson
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although recommended, shared decision making (SDM) is not widely adopted for primary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Champions may influence peer adoption if they are enthusiastic and skilled. We describe adoption of an SDM conversation aid for CV risk reduction (CV Prevention Choice) by champions and early adopters in a pragmatic implementation trial and consider their influence on uptake in clinics. METHODS: We embedded the SDM tool in the electronic health record in three U.S. health care systems. Eight of their 15 affiliated clinics deployed a champion implementation strategy. Adopters used the SDM tool in ≥ 2 routine clinical encounters. Superusers had ≥ 20 encounters. Penetration was the proportion of adopters among eligible clinicians. Adoption and penetration were assessed in the usual care (early adoption), active implementation, and maintenance implementation phases. Thematic analysis methods were used to analyze qualitative data from individual interviews and periodic reflections. RESULTS: Between May 2021 and January 2025, 37 interviews with clinicians and other staff and 65 periodic reflections were completed. Among 176 clinicians, 55% (n = 97) used CV Prevention Choice at least once and 42% (n = 76) adopted it. Champions and other opinion leaders gave presentations and demonstrated their practice, but targeted individual persuasion and group dialogue were less common, especially when champions appreciated peers' preferences. Champions used the tool more frequently (median = 93, IQR 53-150) than non-champions (median = 16, IQR 4-50), although only 4 of the top 20 users were champions. Clinics with champions had higher penetration rates (50% vs 29%) and lower rates of one-time tool use than clinics without champions (17% vs 33%). CONCLUSION: Champions, superusers, and other opinions leaders may influence peer adoption of clinical innovations by sharing their experience, but group discourse may be needed to build the case for uptake of innovations. Superusers may be impactful in clinics without formal champions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol described herein was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 22 June 2020 (No. NCT04450914).

Implementation Science Communications
WellStar Health System (US), Mayo Clinic (US), Altru Health System (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Virginia Hospital Center (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.