MSMEs green practices: a bibliometric and systematic review

Abstract This study systematically assesses current research on green practices in micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) using a combined bibliometric and systematic review approach. The study provides a comprehensive synthesis that identifies leading trends, contributors, sources, methodologies, principal green practices, and persistent research gaps in MSME sustainability literature. Following the key elements of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, this study screened 508 Scopus records and identified 151 bibliometric and 105 systematic review documents. The findings show that research on MSME green practices has sharply increased after 2020, as sustainability, climate action, and business resilience drive the field. Keyword analysis reveals three themes: strategic and capability-based dimension of MSME green transformation; green practices and sustainability performance; and environmental management and stakeholder support. Emerging economies, especially Indonesia, Malaysia, and India, lead in publication output, but only a small group achieves significant citation impact. Quantitative correlational studies using resource-based and institutional frameworks dominate the literature. Main practices focus on resource efficiency, environmental management, waste reduction, green supply chains, eco-design, innovation, circularity, and organizational strategies. Despite progress, context, sectoral, methodological, and theoretical gaps remain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Business Journal
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-026-00877-8
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MSMEs green practices: a bibliometric and systematic review

Melvin Sarsale, Amber Ghea Pablo
Future Business Journal
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

MSMEs green practices: a bibliometric and systematic review

Melvin Sarsale, Amber Ghea Pablo
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study systematically assesses current research on green practices in micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) using a combined bibliometric and systematic review approach. The study provides a comprehensive synthesis that identifies leading trends, contributors, sources, methodologies, principal green practices, and persistent research gaps in MSME sustainability literature. Following the key elements of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, this study screened 508 Scopus records and identified 151 bibliometric and 105 systematic review documents. The findings show that research on MSME green practices has sharply increased after 2020, as sustainability, climate action, and business resilience drive the field. Keyword analysis reveals three themes: strategic and capability-based dimension of MSME green transformation; green practices and sustainability performance; and environmental management and stakeholder support. Emerging economies, especially Indonesia, Malaysia, and India, lead in publication output, but only a small group achieves significant citation impact. Quantitative correlational studies using resource-based and institutional frameworks dominate the literature. Main practices focus on resource efficiency, environmental management, waste reduction, green supply chains, eco-design, innovation, circularity, and organizational strategies. Despite progress, context, sectoral, methodological, and theoretical gaps remain.

Future Business JournalVol. 12(1)
Southern Leyte State University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.