Measurement and Interpretation of Intra-Abdominal Pressure During Physical Activity: A Scoping Review

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is frequently discussed as a main contributor to pelvic floor loading during physical activities; however, the measurement of IAP in this context is complex. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize how IAP has been measured, inferred, and interpreted during physical activities, summarizing sensor types, placement, activity contexts, reported values, measurement properties, and methodological limitations. METHODS: Structured searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed studies reporting IAP during physical activities or exercise (final search: 30 January 2025). RESULTS: Of the 4026 articles retrieved, 52 met the inclusion criteria. IAP was measured using microtip catheters, ingestible capsules, piezoelectric sensors, and air- or fluid-filled balloons placed in the stomach, esophagus, rectum, vagina, and bladder. Sensor measurement properties were rarely described and all sensors lacked validation for use during dynamic activities. Most studies included small samples (28 studies with < 20 participants) and only females (n = 25) or only males (n = 16), limiting generalizability. Reported pressure outcomes were highly variable, and, although consistently referred to as IAP, reflect the context-specific combination of forces (e.g., IAP, organ weight, and acceleration) acting on the sensor in a given activity. CONCLUSION: During physical activities, pressures recorded via body cavity sensors depend on sensor type, placement, and gravitational and acceleration loads as well as IAP. During physical activity, some sensors are prone to recording artifacts. Measurement validation and greater precision in reporting are essential to advance our understanding of pelvic floor loading during physical activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-026-06635-2
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurement and Interpretation of Intra-Abdominal Pressure During Physical Activity: A Scoping Review

Sabine Vesting, L McLean, Marina Petter Rodrigues
International Urogynecology Journal
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
article

Measurement and Interpretation of Intra-Abdominal Pressure During Physical Activity: A Scoping Review

Sabine Vesting, L McLean, Marina Petter Rodrigues
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is frequently discussed as a main contributor to pelvic floor loading during physical activities; however, the measurement of IAP in this context is complex. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize how IAP has been measured, inferred, and interpreted during physical activities, summarizing sensor types, placement, activity contexts, reported values, measurement properties, and methodological limitations. METHODS: Structured searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed studies reporting IAP during physical activities or exercise (final search: 30 January 2025). RESULTS: Of the 4026 articles retrieved, 52 met the inclusion criteria. IAP was measured using microtip catheters, ingestible capsules, piezoelectric sensors, and air- or fluid-filled balloons placed in the stomach, esophagus, rectum, vagina, and bladder. Sensor measurement properties were rarely described and all sensors lacked validation for use during dynamic activities. Most studies included small samples (28 studies with < 20 participants) and only females (n = 25) or only males (n = 16), limiting generalizability. Reported pressure outcomes were highly variable, and, although consistently referred to as IAP, reflect the context-specific combination of forces (e.g., IAP, organ weight, and acceleration) acting on the sensor in a given activity. CONCLUSION: During physical activities, pressures recorded via body cavity sensors depend on sensor type, placement, and gravitational and acceleration loads as well as IAP. During physical activity, some sensors are prone to recording artifacts. Measurement validation and greater precision in reporting are essential to advance our understanding of pelvic floor loading during physical activities.

International Urogynecology Journal
University of Ottawa (CA), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Göteborgs Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.