The nonlinear link between AI and energy poverty: Empirical evidence from global data

Despite the burgeoning literature on artificial intelligence (AI) and sustainable development, cross-country panel research on AI and energy poverty has predominantly assumed a linear association, potentially obscuring stage-dependent dynamics. We examine whether this relationship is instead nonlinear, using a balanced panel of 64 countries from 2000 to 2019. Employing two-way fixed effects and system GMM estimations with Lind and Mehlum U-shape tests, we document a robust inverted U-shaped relationship: industrial-robot adoption is initially associated with higher energy poverty at low penetration levels but with alleviation beyond a critical threshold of approximately 358 industrial robots per million employees. Heterogeneity analysis shows that countries with stronger human capital and institutional quality exhibit flatter inverted-U curves; they are buffered from both the early adverse phase and the subsequent alleviation phase, while maintaining consistently lower energy poverty levels across the AI distribution. Mechanism tests provide suggestive evidence for two supply-side channels, namely energy efficiency enhancement and renewable energy transition. Results are robust to alternative measures, Bartik IV, and spatial lag models. Estimates should be interpreted as robust conditional associations rather than identified causal effects, and they primarily characterize middle- and high-income economies undergoing industrial transformation, with limited applicability to Sub-Saharan Africa. We organize the findings through an interpretive framework labelled the “conditional curse-remedy transformation”.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.148590
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The nonlinear link between AI and energy poverty: Empirical evidence from global data

Jiapeng Dai
Journal of Cleaner Production
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

The nonlinear link between AI and energy poverty: Empirical evidence from global data

Jiapeng Dai
article en

Abstract

Despite the burgeoning literature on artificial intelligence (AI) and sustainable development, cross-country panel research on AI and energy poverty has predominantly assumed a linear association, potentially obscuring stage-dependent dynamics. We examine whether this relationship is instead nonlinear, using a balanced panel of 64 countries from 2000 to 2019. Employing two-way fixed effects and system GMM estimations with Lind and Mehlum U-shape tests, we document a robust inverted U-shaped relationship: industrial-robot adoption is initially associated with higher energy poverty at low penetration levels but with alleviation beyond a critical threshold of approximately 358 industrial robots per million employees. Heterogeneity analysis shows that countries with stronger human capital and institutional quality exhibit flatter inverted-U curves; they are buffered from both the early adverse phase and the subsequent alleviation phase, while maintaining consistently lower energy poverty levels across the AI distribution. Mechanism tests provide suggestive evidence for two supply-side channels, namely energy efficiency enhancement and renewable energy transition. Results are robust to alternative measures, Bartik IV, and spatial lag models. Estimates should be interpreted as robust conditional associations rather than identified causal effects, and they primarily characterize middle- and high-income economies undergoing industrial transformation, with limited applicability to Sub-Saharan Africa. We organize the findings through an interpretive framework labelled the “conditional curse-remedy transformation”.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 566
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.