Direction-Dependent Skin Friction between Snakeskin-Inspired Surfaces and Piles and Normally Consolidated Clay

Driven or jacked foundation elements typically mobilize similar interface shear strengths when loaded in tension and compression, leading to challenges associated with hard installation conditions when the skin friction is high or excessive settlements when it is small. Snakeskin-inspired surfaces have been shown to address this problem by mobilizing greater skin friction in the cranial direction (i.e., against the scales) than in the caudal direction (i.e., along the scales). However, most of the available data is for interfaces with sands. Thus, this paper investigates the direction-dependent skin friction mobilized between normally consolidated clay and snakeskin-inspired surfaces and piles. Laboratory tests are performed to characterize the effect of the asperity height and length on the interface shear behavior at different normal stresses and drainage conditions. Specifically, tests are performed at sufficiently slow and fast shearing rates to generate drained and undrained conditions. Centrifuge load tests shed light on the effect of the snakeskin-inspired texture on the skin friction magnitude and distribution during installation and tensile loading of piles. In both interface element and pile load tests, shearing in the cranial direction mobilized greater skin friction than in the caudal direction. The interface strength increased with asperity height and decreased with asperity length, and the ratio of length to height captured this effect. The pile load tests indicated a skin friction magnitude that is up to 60% greater during pullout than during installation. Additionally, the cranially pulled piles mobilized skin friction magnitudes that were between 2.8 and 4.1 times greater than those mobilized by an untextured aluminum pile. These findings highlight the potential for using snakeskin-inspired surfaces to optimize pile performance by enhancing pullout capacity while limiting the increase in installation forces in clays.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jggefk.gteng-14023
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Direction-Dependent Skin Friction between Snakeskin-Inspired Surfaces and Piles and Normally Consolidated Clay

H R Kim, Alejandro Martinez
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
article

Direction-Dependent Skin Friction between Snakeskin-Inspired Surfaces and Piles and Normally Consolidated Clay

H R Kim, Alejandro Martinez
article en

Abstract

Driven or jacked foundation elements typically mobilize similar interface shear strengths when loaded in tension and compression, leading to challenges associated with hard installation conditions when the skin friction is high or excessive settlements when it is small. Snakeskin-inspired surfaces have been shown to address this problem by mobilizing greater skin friction in the cranial direction (i.e., against the scales) than in the caudal direction (i.e., along the scales). However, most of the available data is for interfaces with sands. Thus, this paper investigates the direction-dependent skin friction mobilized between normally consolidated clay and snakeskin-inspired surfaces and piles. Laboratory tests are performed to characterize the effect of the asperity height and length on the interface shear behavior at different normal stresses and drainage conditions. Specifically, tests are performed at sufficiently slow and fast shearing rates to generate drained and undrained conditions. Centrifuge load tests shed light on the effect of the snakeskin-inspired texture on the skin friction magnitude and distribution during installation and tensile loading of piles. In both interface element and pile load tests, shearing in the cranial direction mobilized greater skin friction than in the caudal direction. The interface strength increased with asperity height and decreased with asperity length, and the ratio of length to height captured this effect. The pile load tests indicated a skin friction magnitude that is up to 60% greater during pullout than during installation. Additionally, the cranially pulled piles mobilized skin friction magnitudes that were between 2.8 and 4.1 times greater than those mobilized by an untextured aluminum pile. These findings highlight the potential for using snakeskin-inspired surfaces to optimize pile performance by enhancing pullout capacity while limiting the increase in installation forces in clays.

Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental EngineeringVol. 152(8)
University of California, Davis (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.