Cultivating science data literacy in K-16 science education through data practices: A systematic review

Abstract As data science advances with the emergence of new computational technologies, science data literacy (SDL)—the ability to understand, use, and critically engage with data to address real-world scientific problems—becomes increasingly vital in science education. However, research on how data practices vary across scientific disciplines and educational levels remains limited, hindering the development of a more cohesive understanding of how SDL can be systematically integrated into diverse educational contexts. This review examines SDL by analyzing 42 peer-reviewed empirical studies (2000–2023) to investigate how students have been engaged in data practices across K–16 science education research. We identify seven core data practices: understanding problems, designing experiments, collecting data, cleaning data, analyzing data, and evaluating and disseminating results, along with their associated facets. Through frequency and association analyses, we observe systematic differences in how these practices are emphasized across disciplines, grade levels, and data types. The reviewed studies suggest that engagement in data practices is associated with both cognitive and non-cognitive learning outcomes. Building on established characterizations of scientific inquiry and problem-solving, along with frameworks such as NGSS and GAISE, we conceptualize SDL as a multifaceted and iterative process, encompassing dimensions from problem identification to data analysis, result synthesis, and dissemination. These dimensions illuminate how scientific knowledge is developed, critiqued, and communicated, which is critical for STEM workforce preparation. Lastly, we identify key challenges evident in the literature and outline directions for future research to support interdisciplinary and sustained approaches to SDL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Instructional Science
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09803-5
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Improvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultivating science data literacy in K-16 science education through data practices: A systematic review

Morgan Diederich, Chungsoo Na, Lili Yan, Hillary Swanson et al.
Instructional Science
Educational Assessment and Improvement
article

Cultivating science data literacy in K-16 science education through data practices: A systematic review

Morgan Diederich, Chungsoo Na, Lili Yan, Hillary Swanson, Jina Kang
article en

Abstract

Abstract As data science advances with the emergence of new computational technologies, science data literacy (SDL)—the ability to understand, use, and critically engage with data to address real-world scientific problems—becomes increasingly vital in science education. However, research on how data practices vary across scientific disciplines and educational levels remains limited, hindering the development of a more cohesive understanding of how SDL can be systematically integrated into diverse educational contexts. This review examines SDL by analyzing 42 peer-reviewed empirical studies (2000–2023) to investigate how students have been engaged in data practices across K–16 science education research. We identify seven core data practices: understanding problems, designing experiments, collecting data, cleaning data, analyzing data, and evaluating and disseminating results, along with their associated facets. Through frequency and association analyses, we observe systematic differences in how these practices are emphasized across disciplines, grade levels, and data types. The reviewed studies suggest that engagement in data practices is associated with both cognitive and non-cognitive learning outcomes. Building on established characterizations of scientific inquiry and problem-solving, along with frameworks such as NGSS and GAISE, we conceptualize SDL as a multifaceted and iterative process, encompassing dimensions from problem identification to data analysis, result synthesis, and dissemination. These dimensions illuminate how scientific knowledge is developed, critiqued, and communicated, which is critical for STEM workforce preparation. Lastly, we identify key challenges evident in the literature and outline directions for future research to support interdisciplinary and sustained approaches to SDL.

Instructional ScienceVol. 54(2)
Utah State University (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Michigan State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Educational Assessment and Improvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.