Digital Medicine and Social Inequality: A Sociomedical Review of Telehealth Access

Abstract The emergence of digital medicine has improved the delivery of health-care but, it has also exposed new forms of social inequalities. Access to telehealth as a multi-dimensional sociomedical issue. Numerous forces shape the issue of access to telehealth. Affordability, availability, acceptability, usability, and timeliness are important. Because telehealth can break down geographical and logistical barriers to care, many populations don’t benefit equally. The ability to access video consultation, web portals, remote monitoring, and digital follow-up may reduce among the low-income, elderly, rural community members, persons with disabilities, migrants, linguistically diverse people and patients with low digital literacy. The review states that telehealth use is strongly affected by device ownership, the affordability of internet and platform design, and reimbursement and trust in digital care. In order for telehealth equity to be realized, more than simply having access to the technology is required. Continuity of care, communication, privacy, satisfaction, and clinical outcomes have to be comparable. To tackle digital health disparities, we must invest in broadband investments, subsidize devices, and train consumers on the digital world. This means creating multilingual telehealth services, platforms designed from users’ perspectives, inclusive reimbursement models, and hybrid care pathways driven by patients. Understanding telehealth as a technology will limit understanding about its proper use and impact which is basically a function of access to resources, skills, institutional support etc. which can be better addressed by framing it as a social intervention. If digital medicine does not take a fair approach it may reproduce or exacerbate existing inequalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20456863
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Medicine and Social Inequality: A Sociomedical Review of Telehealth Access

Izzeldeen Abdullah Alnaimi, Ibrahim Abdul Jaleel Yamani, Ahed J Alkhatib
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Digital Medicine and Social Inequality: A Sociomedical Review of Telehealth Access

Izzeldeen Abdullah Alnaimi, Ibrahim Abdul Jaleel Yamani, Ahed J Alkhatib
article en

Abstract

Abstract The emergence of digital medicine has improved the delivery of health-care but, it has also exposed new forms of social inequalities. Access to telehealth as a multi-dimensional sociomedical issue. Numerous forces shape the issue of access to telehealth. Affordability, availability, acceptability, usability, and timeliness are important. Because telehealth can break down geographical and logistical barriers to care, many populations don’t benefit equally. The ability to access video consultation, web portals, remote monitoring, and digital follow-up may reduce among the low-income, elderly, rural community members, persons with disabilities, migrants, linguistically diverse people and patients with low digital literacy. The review states that telehealth use is strongly affected by device ownership, the affordability of internet and platform design, and reimbursement and trust in digital care. In order for telehealth equity to be realized, more than simply having access to the technology is required. Continuity of care, communication, privacy, satisfaction, and clinical outcomes have to be comparable. To tackle digital health disparities, we must invest in broadband investments, subsidize devices, and train consumers on the digital world. This means creating multilingual telehealth services, platforms designed from users’ perspectives, inclusive reimbursement models, and hybrid care pathways driven by patients. Understanding telehealth as a technology will limit understanding about its proper use and impact which is basically a function of access to resources, skills, institutional support etc. which can be better addressed by framing it as a social intervention. If digital medicine does not take a fair approach it may reproduce or exacerbate existing inequalities.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), Islamic University (BD)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.