Organizational imaginaries

Different theoretical conceptualizations of ‘imaginaries’ are being offered as tractable responses to the ascending organizational challenge known as ‘the future’. Despite their undoubted promise, however, the plurality of conceptualizations of ‘imaginaries’ makes it unclear how the term is contributing to impactful theory. By clarifying the different uses of the concept this paper reveals the theoretical possibilities inherent in imaginaries. First we trace how dominant sources from other fields have inspired organization studies, followed by a categorization of the imaginaries concept in relation to a common entanglement of ‘the human’, ‘the future’ and ‘organization/organizing’ – the human-future-organization nexus. Six categories of organizational imaginaries are proposed: Functional imaginaries, Social imaginaries, Existential imaginaries, Political imaginaries, Sociomaterial imaginaries and Ecological imaginaries. By interrogating the assumptions behind these categories, we conceptualize a further category – ‘transformational imaginaries’ – which indicates a shift of emphasis away from desirable futures and towards desirable presents. Our meta-theoretical approach contributes with a) a clearer distinction between different conceptualizations of imaginaries of use for organizational analyses, b) a contrasting conceptualization of imaginaries of use for understanding immediate experiences of disruption and organizational transformation and c) practical implications for the field that facilitate more precise and impactful applications of organizational imaginaries, in its different conceptual forms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organization Studies
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406261459062
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Organizational imaginaries

Annika Skoglund, Daniel Aditya Tjhin
Organization Studies
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Organizational imaginaries

Annika Skoglund, Daniel Aditya Tjhin
article en

Abstract

Different theoretical conceptualizations of ‘imaginaries’ are being offered as tractable responses to the ascending organizational challenge known as ‘the future’. Despite their undoubted promise, however, the plurality of conceptualizations of ‘imaginaries’ makes it unclear how the term is contributing to impactful theory. By clarifying the different uses of the concept this paper reveals the theoretical possibilities inherent in imaginaries. First we trace how dominant sources from other fields have inspired organization studies, followed by a categorization of the imaginaries concept in relation to a common entanglement of ‘the human’, ‘the future’ and ‘organization/organizing’ – the human-future-organization nexus. Six categories of organizational imaginaries are proposed: Functional imaginaries, Social imaginaries, Existential imaginaries, Political imaginaries, Sociomaterial imaginaries and Ecological imaginaries. By interrogating the assumptions behind these categories, we conceptualize a further category – ‘transformational imaginaries’ – which indicates a shift of emphasis away from desirable futures and towards desirable presents. Our meta-theoretical approach contributes with a) a clearer distinction between different conceptualizations of imaginaries of use for organizational analyses, b) a contrasting conceptualization of imaginaries of use for understanding immediate experiences of disruption and organizational transformation and c) practical implications for the field that facilitate more precise and impactful applications of organizational imaginaries, in its different conceptual forms.

Organization Studies
Uppsala University (SE), University of Bristol (GB)
Università degli Studi di Cagliari, University of Bristol, Uppsala Universitet
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.