A Hierarchical Framework to Assess Ecological Niche Across Levels of Biological Organization

ABSTRACT Background Ecological niches are commonly treated as species‐level properties, assuming uniform responses to environmental and biotic gradients. However, empirical evidence increasingly shows that ecological differentiation often arises within species, as populations experience distinct environmental regimes, biotic interactions and evolutionary histories. These patterns highlight the need for a framework that captures how niche attributes emerge across levels of biological organization. Conceptual Framework We develop a hierarchical framework for the Hutchinsonian niche in which ecological structure becomes most coherent at the population level, where local selection, demography and ecological interactions intersect. Within this framework, niche attributes such as position, breadth and functional organization arise from population‐level processes and integrate non‐additively into species‐level niche envelopes, while remaining fully compatible with classical theory. Empirical Synthesis Evidence from diverse taxa and ecosystems demonstrates consistent divergence among populations in climatic tolerances, resource use and functional traits. These divergences reflect localized ecological filtering, dispersal constraints and adaptive differentiation, and are supported by genetic, isotopic and trait‐based studies. Together, these findings indicate that population‐level structure is a pervasive component of ecological niches. Implications A hierarchical niche framework improves the mechanistic basis for ecological modelling, biogeographic inference and conservation. Extending the classical Biotic–Abiotic–Mobility (BAM) framework to its population‐structured formulation (BAMp) enables characterization of population‐specific abiotic, biotic and mobility components. We outline operational approaches—including spatial stratification, hierarchical modelling and integration of functional and movement data—to incorporate population‐level structure into ecological analyses. Conclusion By making explicit the hierarchical organization through which ecological structure emerges, this framework provides a more biologically grounded basis for interpreting ecological niches and species' environmental responses under environmental change, and enables the identification of ecologically meaningful units for conservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70258
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Hierarchical Framework to Assess Ecological Niche Across Levels of Biological Organization

Rodrigo Ramírez‐Álvarez, Konrad Górski, A. Townsend Peterson
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

A Hierarchical Framework to Assess Ecological Niche Across Levels of Biological Organization

Rodrigo Ramírez‐Álvarez, Konrad Górski, A. Townsend Peterson
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Ecological niches are commonly treated as species‐level properties, assuming uniform responses to environmental and biotic gradients. However, empirical evidence increasingly shows that ecological differentiation often arises within species, as populations experience distinct environmental regimes, biotic interactions and evolutionary histories. These patterns highlight the need for a framework that captures how niche attributes emerge across levels of biological organization. Conceptual Framework We develop a hierarchical framework for the Hutchinsonian niche in which ecological structure becomes most coherent at the population level, where local selection, demography and ecological interactions intersect. Within this framework, niche attributes such as position, breadth and functional organization arise from population‐level processes and integrate non‐additively into species‐level niche envelopes, while remaining fully compatible with classical theory. Empirical Synthesis Evidence from diverse taxa and ecosystems demonstrates consistent divergence among populations in climatic tolerances, resource use and functional traits. These divergences reflect localized ecological filtering, dispersal constraints and adaptive differentiation, and are supported by genetic, isotopic and trait‐based studies. Together, these findings indicate that population‐level structure is a pervasive component of ecological niches. Implications A hierarchical niche framework improves the mechanistic basis for ecological modelling, biogeographic inference and conservation. Extending the classical Biotic–Abiotic–Mobility (BAM) framework to its population‐structured formulation (BAMp) enables characterization of population‐specific abiotic, biotic and mobility components. We outline operational approaches—including spatial stratification, hierarchical modelling and integration of functional and movement data—to incorporate population‐level structure into ecological analyses. Conclusion By making explicit the hierarchical organization through which ecological structure emerges, this framework provides a more biologically grounded basis for interpreting ecological niches and species' environmental responses under environmental change, and enables the identification of ecologically meaningful units for conservation.

Global Ecology and BiogeographyVol. 35(6)
University of Kansas (US), Austral University of Chile (CL), Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción (CL)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.