Assessment Tools for Adherence to Prophylactic Haemophilia Treatment in Adult and Adolescent Patients: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION: Prophylactic treatment offers greater clinical benefits than on-demand therapy for patients with haemophilia, but these benefits depend on sustained adherence. Although adherence assessment is essential for understanding treatment effectiveness, a wide range of tools is used, and their characteristics, scope, and limitations have not been systematically synthesized. AIM: This systematic review aimed to identify and critically appraise assessment tools used to measure adherence to prophylactic haemophilia treatment in adult and adolescent patients. METHODS: The protocol followed PRISMA-P guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021273813). We conducted a systematic search across multiple databases including PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies published between 2000-2022 that reported on adherence to prophylaxis in adolescents and adults with haemophilia. A narrative synthesis was used to summarise key themes, variations, and the strengths and limitations of the studies. RESULTS: From the 22 studies, adherence was assessed using objective measures (prescription records), self-reported questionnaires, technology-assisted tools (electronic diaries and the Medtep Hemophilia online platform), and qualitative approaches. Self-reported questionnaires, particularly VERITAS-Pro and VERITAS-PRN, were the most frequently used adherence measures. Adherence assessment was frequently examined alongside medication supply and treatment practices, quality of life, bleeding episodes and haemarthrosis, joint health status, health beliefs and self-efficacy, environmental influences, and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. CONCLUSION: VERITAS-Pro and VERITAS -PRN are central to the assessment of adherence to prophylactic haemophilia treatment. Their use alongside quality of life and illness perception measures supports clinical assessment and interpretation of adherence in both research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Haemophilia
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.70324
Primary Topic
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment Tools for Adherence to Prophylactic Haemophilia Treatment in Adult and Adolescent Patients: A Systematic Review

Fadzlin Mohd Mokhtar, Hasniza Zaman Huri, Wei Lim Chong, Sutha Rajakumar et al.
Haemophilia
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
article

Assessment Tools for Adherence to Prophylactic Haemophilia Treatment in Adult and Adolescent Patients: A Systematic Review

Fadzlin Mohd Mokhtar, Hasniza Zaman Huri, Wei Lim Chong, Sutha Rajakumar, Mark Cheong Wing Loong, Mohammed Magdy Hassanein
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prophylactic treatment offers greater clinical benefits than on-demand therapy for patients with haemophilia, but these benefits depend on sustained adherence. Although adherence assessment is essential for understanding treatment effectiveness, a wide range of tools is used, and their characteristics, scope, and limitations have not been systematically synthesized. AIM: This systematic review aimed to identify and critically appraise assessment tools used to measure adherence to prophylactic haemophilia treatment in adult and adolescent patients. METHODS: The protocol followed PRISMA-P guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021273813). We conducted a systematic search across multiple databases including PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies published between 2000-2022 that reported on adherence to prophylaxis in adolescents and adults with haemophilia. A narrative synthesis was used to summarise key themes, variations, and the strengths and limitations of the studies. RESULTS: From the 22 studies, adherence was assessed using objective measures (prescription records), self-reported questionnaires, technology-assisted tools (electronic diaries and the Medtep Hemophilia online platform), and qualitative approaches. Self-reported questionnaires, particularly VERITAS-Pro and VERITAS-PRN, were the most frequently used adherence measures. Adherence assessment was frequently examined alongside medication supply and treatment practices, quality of life, bleeding episodes and haemarthrosis, joint health status, health beliefs and self-efficacy, environmental influences, and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. CONCLUSION: VERITAS-Pro and VERITAS -PRN are central to the assessment of adherence to prophylactic haemophilia treatment. Their use alongside quality of life and illness perception measures supports clinical assessment and interpretation of adherence in both research and practice.

Haemophilia
Monash University Malaysia (MY), University Malaya Medical Centre (MY), Serdang Hospital (MY), University of Malaya (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.