Therapeutic Alliance and Autism: A Scoping Review

ABSTRACT Background Autistic children and adults commonly experience co‐occurring mental health conditions. It is critical that we understand key therapeutic factors that promote positive therapy outcomes for autistic individuals. Prior research suggests that therapeutic alliance (TA) positively impacts psychotherapeutic outcomes, but most has been conducted with allistic populations. This scoping review broadly aimed to synthesise emerging research on TA for autistic individuals and identify gaps in the literature about TA for autistic individuals. Methods PRISMA scoping review guidelines were followed. A literature search conducted in January 2025 resulted in n = 15 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Studies included n = 657 autistic individuals aged 7–77 years. Results Findings supported the reliability of some standardised tools (e.g., TASC‐R , TPOCS‐A ) for measuring TA for autistic youth. No identified studies used standardised tools to assess TA for autistic adults older than 21 years of age. TA was positively associated with psychotherapeutic outcomes for autistic youth (e.g., greater reductions in anxiety symptoms) across most quantitative studies. Autistic children may be at risk for weaker TAs compared to allistic children. Some pretreatment child factors were identified that may be associated with TA (e.g., cognitive skills, emotional regulation, psychopathology) and several therapist characteristics were identified that may promote strong TAs for autistic adults based on qualitative findings (e.g., respect, autism knowledge, validation, providing structure and accommodations, self‐disclosure). Additional gaps in the literature are discussed. Conclusion TA can be reliably measured for autistic youth and appears to be connected to both pretreatment client factors and therapy outcomes, though additional work with more diverse samples is needed. Therapist behaviours and use of neuro‐affirming strategies can impact TA for autistic adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Counselling and Psychotherapy Research
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.70142
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Therapeutic Alliance and Autism: A Scoping Review

Ainsley Losh, Kaylin Russell
Counselling and Psychotherapy Research
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Therapeutic Alliance and Autism: A Scoping Review

Ainsley Losh, Kaylin Russell
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Autistic children and adults commonly experience co‐occurring mental health conditions. It is critical that we understand key therapeutic factors that promote positive therapy outcomes for autistic individuals. Prior research suggests that therapeutic alliance (TA) positively impacts psychotherapeutic outcomes, but most has been conducted with allistic populations. This scoping review broadly aimed to synthesise emerging research on TA for autistic individuals and identify gaps in the literature about TA for autistic individuals. Methods PRISMA scoping review guidelines were followed. A literature search conducted in January 2025 resulted in n = 15 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Studies included n = 657 autistic individuals aged 7–77 years. Results Findings supported the reliability of some standardised tools (e.g., TASC‐R , TPOCS‐A ) for measuring TA for autistic youth. No identified studies used standardised tools to assess TA for autistic adults older than 21 years of age. TA was positively associated with psychotherapeutic outcomes for autistic youth (e.g., greater reductions in anxiety symptoms) across most quantitative studies. Autistic children may be at risk for weaker TAs compared to allistic children. Some pretreatment child factors were identified that may be associated with TA (e.g., cognitive skills, emotional regulation, psychopathology) and several therapist characteristics were identified that may promote strong TAs for autistic adults based on qualitative findings (e.g., respect, autism knowledge, validation, providing structure and accommodations, self‐disclosure). Additional gaps in the literature are discussed. Conclusion TA can be reliably measured for autistic youth and appears to be connected to both pretreatment client factors and therapy outcomes, though additional work with more diverse samples is needed. Therapist behaviours and use of neuro‐affirming strategies can impact TA for autistic adults.

Counselling and Psychotherapy ResearchVol. 26(2)
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.