How patients navigate specialist referral pathways in hand surgery: a cross-sectional survey study

BACKGROUND: Patients navigating specialist care are often presented with multiple options and information sources. In fragmented healthcare systems, understanding how individuals select specialists is important for optimizing referral pathways and access to care. This study examined factors influencing patient selection of hand surgeons, including the relative importance of primary care recommendations, surgeon characteristics, online information (such as physician rating websites and internet-based search resources), opinions of family and friends, as well as demographic differences in these preferences. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey study was conducted among adults residing in New England. A 30-item online questionnaire was developed with input from hand surgeons and researchers and refined through pilot testing in lay participants. The survey was built in REDCap and distributed via ResearchMatch to 3,000 registrants, of whom 868 responded (response rate 28.9%). A total of 739 fully completed surveys were analyzed. Associations between demographic variables and factors influencing specialist selection were evaluated using chi-square tests, t-tests, and multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusting for demographic covariates. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Primary care physician (PCP) recommendation (26%) and internet-based resources (24%) were the most frequently reported methods for identifying a hand surgeon. 83% of respondents reported that a PCP recommendation influenced their specialist selection. Increasing age was independently associated with decreased importance attributed to online physician ratings (p < 0.0001), opinions of family and friends (p < 0.001), and insurance-related factors (p < 0.0001). Most respondents reported a preference for orthopedic practice settings (77%) and orthopedic training backgrounds (90%). CONCLUSION: In this survey, PCP recommendations were the strongest reported influence on specialist selection, with age-related differences in the importance of online and interpersonal information sources. These findings suggest that primary care plays a major role in reported pathways to specialty hand care and that communication strategies may need to be tailored to different demographic groups within healthcare systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14812-8
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How patients navigate specialist referral pathways in hand surgery: a cross-sectional survey study

Katiri Wagner, Toni Engmann, Stephen A. Stearns, Michael F. McTague et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Healthcare Systems and Technology
article

How patients navigate specialist referral pathways in hand surgery: a cross-sectional survey study

Katiri Wagner, Toni Engmann, Stephen A. Stearns, Michael F. McTague, Julius Asschenfeldt, Arriyan S. Dowlatshahi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients navigating specialist care are often presented with multiple options and information sources. In fragmented healthcare systems, understanding how individuals select specialists is important for optimizing referral pathways and access to care. This study examined factors influencing patient selection of hand surgeons, including the relative importance of primary care recommendations, surgeon characteristics, online information (such as physician rating websites and internet-based search resources), opinions of family and friends, as well as demographic differences in these preferences. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey study was conducted among adults residing in New England. A 30-item online questionnaire was developed with input from hand surgeons and researchers and refined through pilot testing in lay participants. The survey was built in REDCap and distributed via ResearchMatch to 3,000 registrants, of whom 868 responded (response rate 28.9%). A total of 739 fully completed surveys were analyzed. Associations between demographic variables and factors influencing specialist selection were evaluated using chi-square tests, t-tests, and multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusting for demographic covariates. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Primary care physician (PCP) recommendation (26%) and internet-based resources (24%) were the most frequently reported methods for identifying a hand surgeon. 83% of respondents reported that a PCP recommendation influenced their specialist selection. Increasing age was independently associated with decreased importance attributed to online physician ratings (p < 0.0001), opinions of family and friends (p < 0.001), and insurance-related factors (p < 0.0001). Most respondents reported a preference for orthopedic practice settings (77%) and orthopedic training backgrounds (90%). CONCLUSION: In this survey, PCP recommendations were the strongest reported influence on specialist selection, with age-related differences in the importance of online and interpersonal information sources. These findings suggest that primary care plays a major role in reported pathways to specialty hand care and that communication strategies may need to be tailored to different demographic groups within healthcare systems.

BMC Health Services Research
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Healthcare Systems and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.