THE VACUUM CATASTROPHE AND THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Rajith Perera's thermodynamic model in confrontation with the axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cos

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Rajith Perera’s A Thermodynamic Interpretation of the Vacuum Catastrophe via a Λ-Selected Quantum Scale in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO), developed by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva. The study examines Perera’s thermodynamic interpretation of the vacuum catastrophe, especially his thesis that the problem arises from treating spacetime as a mechanically infinite system, whereas a positive cosmological constant Λ implies a finite-entropy vacuum governed by de Sitter horizon thermodynamics. The analysis articulates Perera’s framework with the Seven Absolute Truths of the Theory of Objectivity, its phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras. Special attention is given to the role of boundary, horizon, entropy, information, vacuum finitude, emergent gravity, and the equilibrium between zero-point pressure and curvature regulation. From the perspective of TO, Perera’s Λ-selected scale is interpreted as a possible physical analogue of a stabilizing boundary regime, in which expansive and reductive tendencies may be read in dialogue with the Expansive Inducer Effect and the Reductive Inducer Effect. The article argues that Perera’s work has strong dialogical value for the Theory of Objectivity because it reframes the vacuum not as empty absence or mechanically infinite background, but as a finite, informational, thermodynamically regulated structure. This is especially relevant to TO’s modal treatment of Nothingness, infinity as a non-element, boundary as a condition of distinction, and the transcendent substance currently interpreted in TO as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiation. The study concludes that Perera’s article does not directly confirm the Theory of Objectivity, since it presupposes spacetime, Λ, de Sitter geometry, and quantum field theory, whereas TO seeks a modal deduction of universe, space, time, matter, observation, and transcendence from necessary axioms. Nevertheless, the analyzed work is evaluated as a highly relevant interlocutor for TO, particularly along the axes of vacuum, boundary, entropy, information, emergent gravity, and cosmological stabilization. This analytical text counted on the analytical support of ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Rajith Perera; vacuum catastrophe; cosmological constant; Λ-selected quantum scale; de Sitter horizon; horizon thermodynamics; finite-entropy vacuum; zero-point energy; emergent gravity; boundary; entropy; information; atomic radiation; transcendent substance; Inducer Effects; Expansive Inducer Effect; Reductive Inducer Effect; modal ontology; cosmology