Distinct Intra-State Urban Structures of Georgia and North Carolina: An Analysis of the Relationship between Intra-state Urban Structure and Interurban Inequality

abstract: The Southern United States has experienced an economic and population boom since the end of World War II, leading to the growth of the States and metropolitan areas across the region. This growth has been uneven in nature, with two states, Georgia and North Carolina, emerging as leaders within the region. While the two states are similar across many aspects, especially in population and economic terms, one major difference between the two states is their distinct intra-state urban structures: Georgia is characterized by a more concentrated intra-state urban structure and North Carolina by a more balanced one. This paper first identifies the varying distinct intra-state urban structures for both states, then classifies each metropolitan area into one of four development groups based on economic performance to assess whether less developed metros are converging with more developed ones or if they are falling behind. It then assesses certain socioeconomic characteristics for each development group and examines the differences across development groups, before measuring interurban inequalities within each state. Our results show that, although both Georgia and North Carolina exhibit a degree of interurban inequality, Georgia has higher levels of interurban inequalities than North Carolina.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Southeastern geographer
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2026.a991480
Primary Topic
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinct Intra-State Urban Structures of Georgia and North Carolina: An Analysis of the Relationship between Intra-state Urban Structure and Interurban Inequality

Ronald V. Kalafsky, Johnathan P. Lynn
Southeastern geographer
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
article

Distinct Intra-State Urban Structures of Georgia and North Carolina: An Analysis of the Relationship between Intra-state Urban Structure and Interurban Inequality

Ronald V. Kalafsky, Johnathan P. Lynn
article en

Abstract

abstract: The Southern United States has experienced an economic and population boom since the end of World War II, leading to the growth of the States and metropolitan areas across the region. This growth has been uneven in nature, with two states, Georgia and North Carolina, emerging as leaders within the region. While the two states are similar across many aspects, especially in population and economic terms, one major difference between the two states is their distinct intra-state urban structures: Georgia is characterized by a more concentrated intra-state urban structure and North Carolina by a more balanced one. This paper first identifies the varying distinct intra-state urban structures for both states, then classifies each metropolitan area into one of four development groups based on economic performance to assess whether less developed metros are converging with more developed ones or if they are falling behind. It then assesses certain socioeconomic characteristics for each development group and examines the differences across development groups, before measuring interurban inequalities within each state. Our results show that, although both Georgia and North Carolina exhibit a degree of interurban inequality, Georgia has higher levels of interurban inequalities than North Carolina.

Southeastern geographerVol. 66(2)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.