Barriers for Secondary Hypertension Screening in the United States: A National Physician Survey

BACKGROUND: Hypertension affects almost half of US adults and is a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although expert guidelines recommend screening for secondary hypertension in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension and other high-risk groups, screening is conducted in <2% of candidates. This study aimed to determine barriers for secondary hypertension screening across US practices. METHODS: Primary care physicians, cardiologists, nephrologists, and endocrinologists, randomly selected from active members of the American Medical Association, were surveyed on barriers for secondary hypertension screening. RESULTS: Response rate was 67% (425 of 633 response-eligible physicians). The leading reported barriers preventing secondary hypertension screening included visit time constraints (43.5%), poor ancillary support (29.4%), and testing-related logistics (27.5%). Primary care physicians were 10- to 17-fold less likely to be familiar with testing interpretation and subsequent steps than nephrologists and endocrinologists. Physicians in practices covered largely by Medicare were twice more likely to report poor ancillary support than physicians in practices covered primarily by private health insurance. Private practice physicians were more likely to report reimbursement concerns (adjusted odds ratio, 3.4 [95% CI, 1.6-7.7]) and poor ancillary support (adjusted odds ratio, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.3-3.6]) but also more likely to have access to specialists (adjusted odds ratio, 4.0 [95% CI, 1.2-13.5]) than physicians practicing in large medical groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings call for measures to address critical barriers in secondary hypertension screening. Strategies needed to facilitate personalized hypertension care include optimization of clinic visit duration, ancillary support, education initiatives, and timely access to specialists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.126.049858
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers for Secondary Hypertension Screening in the United States: A National Physician Survey

Zara Salman, Maria Papaleontiou, Z. Tuba Suzer‐Gurtekin, Liping Zhang et al.
Journal of the American Heart Association
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Barriers for Secondary Hypertension Screening in the United States: A National Physician Survey

Zara Salman, Maria Papaleontiou, Z. Tuba Suzer‐Gurtekin, Liping Zhang, Adina F. Turcu, Lili Zhao, Gina Vincent, Sonja M. Kromm
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypertension affects almost half of US adults and is a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although expert guidelines recommend screening for secondary hypertension in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension and other high-risk groups, screening is conducted in <2% of candidates. This study aimed to determine barriers for secondary hypertension screening across US practices. METHODS: Primary care physicians, cardiologists, nephrologists, and endocrinologists, randomly selected from active members of the American Medical Association, were surveyed on barriers for secondary hypertension screening. RESULTS: Response rate was 67% (425 of 633 response-eligible physicians). The leading reported barriers preventing secondary hypertension screening included visit time constraints (43.5%), poor ancillary support (29.4%), and testing-related logistics (27.5%). Primary care physicians were 10- to 17-fold less likely to be familiar with testing interpretation and subsequent steps than nephrologists and endocrinologists. Physicians in practices covered largely by Medicare were twice more likely to report poor ancillary support than physicians in practices covered primarily by private health insurance. Private practice physicians were more likely to report reimbursement concerns (adjusted odds ratio, 3.4 [95% CI, 1.6-7.7]) and poor ancillary support (adjusted odds ratio, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.3-3.6]) but also more likely to have access to specialists (adjusted odds ratio, 4.0 [95% CI, 1.2-13.5]) than physicians practicing in large medical groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings call for measures to address critical barriers in secondary hypertension screening. Strategies needed to facilitate personalized hypertension care include optimization of clinic visit duration, ancillary support, education initiatives, and timely access to specialists.

Journal of the American Heart Association
University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.