Constructing fit: An empirical study of employees' understanding of fit at work

Abstract Fit is widely used in organizational practice to guide hiring, retention, and employee management decisions, yet how individuals actually experience and make sense of fit remains poorly understood. In response, this study advances a constructivist account of person–environment fit by examining how it becomes meaningful to individuals in practice. Based on in‐depth interviews with 60 employees in three major Chinese cities, the study explores how people understand and articulate fit when invited to reflect on their work experience without predefined conceptual guidance. The findings indicate that fit is often tacit, weakly articulated, or taken for granted in routine work contexts, and is typically constructed through reflective narration rather than experienced as a stable, ongoing judgement. Participants assembled their understanding of fit through contrast, temporal comparison, and contextual interpretation, drawing on instrumental, relational, and moral considerations. Through reflexive thematic analysis, we show that fit emerges dialogically and unevenly, shaped by career trajectories, organizational change, and culturally embedded expectations. We develop a process model that reconceptualizes fit as an interpretive and temporally situated construction rather than a static alignment. The study contributes to contemporary fit research by clarifying how fit comes into awareness and acquires meaning in employees' working lives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70127
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing fit: An empirical study of employees' understanding of fit at work

Sandhya Subramanian, Yuwei Sun, Danielle L. Talbot, Jon Billsberry
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Constructing fit: An empirical study of employees' understanding of fit at work

Sandhya Subramanian, Yuwei Sun, Danielle L. Talbot, Jon Billsberry
article en

Abstract

Abstract Fit is widely used in organizational practice to guide hiring, retention, and employee management decisions, yet how individuals actually experience and make sense of fit remains poorly understood. In response, this study advances a constructivist account of person–environment fit by examining how it becomes meaningful to individuals in practice. Based on in‐depth interviews with 60 employees in three major Chinese cities, the study explores how people understand and articulate fit when invited to reflect on their work experience without predefined conceptual guidance. The findings indicate that fit is often tacit, weakly articulated, or taken for granted in routine work contexts, and is typically constructed through reflective narration rather than experienced as a stable, ongoing judgement. Participants assembled their understanding of fit through contrast, temporal comparison, and contextual interpretation, drawing on instrumental, relational, and moral considerations. Through reflexive thematic analysis, we show that fit emerges dialogically and unevenly, shaped by career trajectories, organizational change, and culturally embedded expectations. We develop a process model that reconceptualizes fit as an interpretive and temporally situated construction rather than a static alignment. The study contributes to contemporary fit research by clarifying how fit comes into awareness and acquires meaning in employees' working lives.

Journal of Occupational and Organizational PsychologyVol. 99(2)
La Trobe University (AU), University of Wollongong (AU), University of Divinity (AU), Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.