The Intersection of Bias, Critical Thinking, & Innovation: A Quantitative Analysis

This study examines whether gender differences exist in critical thinking skills among elementary school students through a secondary quantitative analysis of an existing dataset (Putera, 2020). Using a sample of 25 students with complete data, the study employs linear regression and an independent samples t-test to evaluate the relationship between gender and critical thinking test scores. Results indicate that female students scored slightly higher on average than male students; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.634). Regression findings further confirm that gender is not a significant predictor of critical thinking performance. These findings align with existing literature suggesting that instructional strategies, classroom environment, and developmental factors may play a more substantial role than gender in shaping critical thinking skills at the elementary level. Limitations include a small sample size and limited variables, which restrict statistical power and generalizability. The study highlights the importance of equitable and inclusive educational practices and suggests directions for future research using larger, more diverse samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Scholarship Without Borders Journal
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57229/2834-2267.1083
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Intersection of Bias, Critical Thinking, & Innovation: A Quantitative Analysis

Ángel Huerta, Jacob Sands
The Scholarship Without Borders Journal
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

The Intersection of Bias, Critical Thinking, & Innovation: A Quantitative Analysis

Ángel Huerta, Jacob Sands
article en

Abstract

This study examines whether gender differences exist in critical thinking skills among elementary school students through a secondary quantitative analysis of an existing dataset (Putera, 2020). Using a sample of 25 students with complete data, the study employs linear regression and an independent samples t-test to evaluate the relationship between gender and critical thinking test scores. Results indicate that female students scored slightly higher on average than male students; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.634). Regression findings further confirm that gender is not a significant predictor of critical thinking performance. These findings align with existing literature suggesting that instructional strategies, classroom environment, and developmental factors may play a more substantial role than gender in shaping critical thinking skills at the elementary level. Limitations include a small sample size and limited variables, which restrict statistical power and generalizability. The study highlights the importance of equitable and inclusive educational practices and suggests directions for future research using larger, more diverse samples.

The Scholarship Without Borders JournalVol. 4(2)
Pepperdine University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.