Predictive factors for poor mobilization in autologous stem cell transplant: a multivariate model

Introduction Inadequate stem cell mobilization remains a major challenge in autologous stem cell transplantation. Although multiple risk factors for poor mobilization have been suggested, their clinical utility is limited. This study aimed to identify predictors of poor mobilization and develop a clinically applicable predictive model. Material and Methods A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation was conducted. Poor mobilization was defined as a total CD34 + cell collection of less than 2 × 10⁶ cells/kg or the requirement for extended apheresis with multiple collection cycles. Results A total of 430 patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (n = 134), non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (n = 113), and multiple myeloma (n = 183) were included in this study. Poor mobilization was observed in 28.6% (123/430) of patients. A predictive model was developed using multivariate analysis, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97 (p-value <0.001) when including the CD34 + cell count and 0.98 (p-value <0.001) when excluding it. Independent risk factors for poor mobilization included low platelet count, bone marrow infiltration, advanced disease status, and exposure to ≥2 alkylating agents. The final model demonstrated a specificity of 98.7% (95% CI: 96.7–99.6%) and a sensitivity of 91.1% (95% CI: 84.6–95.4%). Conclusion This predictive model can be applied before the initiation of the mobilization process. With sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and positive likelihood ratio all exceeding 90% in both versions, the model demonstrates high effectiveness and clinical utility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hematology Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2026.106475
Primary Topic
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive factors for poor mobilization in autologous stem cell transplant: a multivariate model

Shirin Ferdowsi, S.A. Mousavi, Maryam Bagherian, Mohammad Vaezi et al.
Hematology Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
article

Predictive factors for poor mobilization in autologous stem cell transplant: a multivariate model

Shirin Ferdowsi, S.A. Mousavi, Maryam Bagherian, Mohammad Vaezi, Hossein Kamranzadeh, Saeed Mohammadi, Mahdi Jalili, Ahmadreza Shamshiri
article en

Abstract

Introduction Inadequate stem cell mobilization remains a major challenge in autologous stem cell transplantation. Although multiple risk factors for poor mobilization have been suggested, their clinical utility is limited. This study aimed to identify predictors of poor mobilization and develop a clinically applicable predictive model. Material and Methods A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation was conducted. Poor mobilization was defined as a total CD34 + cell collection of less than 2 × 10⁶ cells/kg or the requirement for extended apheresis with multiple collection cycles. Results A total of 430 patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (n = 134), non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (n = 113), and multiple myeloma (n = 183) were included in this study. Poor mobilization was observed in 28.6% (123/430) of patients. A predictive model was developed using multivariate analysis, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97 (p-value <0.001) when including the CD34 + cell count and 0.98 (p-value <0.001) when excluding it. Independent risk factors for poor mobilization included low platelet count, bone marrow infiltration, advanced disease status, and exposure to ≥2 alkylating agents. The final model demonstrated a specificity of 98.7% (95% CI: 96.7–99.6%) and a sensitivity of 91.1% (95% CI: 84.6–95.4%). Conclusion This predictive model can be applied before the initiation of the mobilization process. With sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and positive likelihood ratio all exceeding 90% in both versions, the model demonstrates high effectiveness and clinical utility.

Hematology Transfusion and Cell TherapyVol. 48(3)
University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Stem Cell Technology Research Center (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.