Mapping the role of artificial intelligence in health-related stigma: a scoping review

Stigma remains a major barrier to equitable health and well-being, while artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized as a tool with both potential and risk in addressing this challenge. However, research on AI and stigma is fragmented across disciplines, hindering a unified understanding of their intersection. To consolidate existing evidence, we conducted a scoping review of 11,769 records published between 2016 and 2025 and identified 70 studies examining the relationship between AI and health-related stigma. Four research themes emerged: AI measuring stigma (n = 42, 60%), stigma influencing AI use (n = 15, 21%), AI increasing stigma (n = 9, 13%), and AI reducing stigma (n = 4, 6%). Most studies focused on mental health disorders, revealing an imbalance in attention to other health conditions. Across studies, we observed inconsistent definitions of stigma, limited cross-cultural perspectives, and few evaluations of real-world AI applications. Addressing these gaps will be critical for developing responsible and equitable AI systems that mitigate rather than reinforce health stigma across broader societal and health contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02832-x
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the role of artificial intelligence in health-related stigma: a scoping review

Jack Jamieson, Wataru Akahori, Han Meng, Shuqi Wang et al.
npj Digital Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Mapping the role of artificial intelligence in health-related stigma: a scoping review

Jack Jamieson, Wataru Akahori, Han Meng, Shuqi Wang, Tianqi Song, Yi-Chieh Lee
article en

Abstract

Stigma remains a major barrier to equitable health and well-being, while artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized as a tool with both potential and risk in addressing this challenge. However, research on AI and stigma is fragmented across disciplines, hindering a unified understanding of their intersection. To consolidate existing evidence, we conducted a scoping review of 11,769 records published between 2016 and 2025 and identified 70 studies examining the relationship between AI and health-related stigma. Four research themes emerged: AI measuring stigma (n = 42, 60%), stigma influencing AI use (n = 15, 21%), AI increasing stigma (n = 9, 13%), and AI reducing stigma (n = 4, 6%). Most studies focused on mental health disorders, revealing an imbalance in attention to other health conditions. Across studies, we observed inconsistent definitions of stigma, limited cross-cultural perspectives, and few evaluations of real-world AI applications. Addressing these gaps will be critical for developing responsible and equitable AI systems that mitigate rather than reinforce health stigma across broader societal and health contexts.

npj Digital Medicine
National University of Singapore (SG), NTT (Japan) (JP)
National University of Singapore, Ministry of Education - Singapore
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.