The Evaluation‐Systems Nexus: Opportunities for Co‐Creating New Social Possibilities Through Policy Enactment

ABSTRACT Evaluation (and evaluators) evolve and adapt their practices in response to societal changes. In recent years, substantial budget cuts and an increased recognition of post‐truth tactics undermining the credibility of scientific evidence have brought to the fore the limitations of a traditional rational‐objectivist program evaluation. Within the evaluation field, conversations are shifting toward evaluating complexity and systems change. Using key concepts within systems thinking—understanding interrelationships , acknowledging perspectives , and reflecting on boundaries —as an organizing framework, I examine how systems thinking and systems approaches can create opportunities for organizational actors to approach policy enactment anew by explicitly embracing a deeply reflective, co‐constructed, and adaptive, iterative learning process. I illustrate how adopting this mindset and approach to evaluation can open opportunities for organizational actors to co‐create new social possibilities through their policy development and enactment processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Directions for Evaluation
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.70027
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Evaluation‐Systems Nexus: Opportunities for Co‐Creating New Social Possibilities Through Policy Enactment

C Falls-Hubert Kelly
New Directions for Evaluation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

The Evaluation‐Systems Nexus: Opportunities for Co‐Creating New Social Possibilities Through Policy Enactment

C Falls-Hubert Kelly
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Evaluation (and evaluators) evolve and adapt their practices in response to societal changes. In recent years, substantial budget cuts and an increased recognition of post‐truth tactics undermining the credibility of scientific evidence have brought to the fore the limitations of a traditional rational‐objectivist program evaluation. Within the evaluation field, conversations are shifting toward evaluating complexity and systems change. Using key concepts within systems thinking—understanding interrelationships , acknowledging perspectives , and reflecting on boundaries —as an organizing framework, I examine how systems thinking and systems approaches can create opportunities for organizational actors to approach policy enactment anew by explicitly embracing a deeply reflective, co‐constructed, and adaptive, iterative learning process. I illustrate how adopting this mindset and approach to evaluation can open opportunities for organizational actors to co‐create new social possibilities through their policy development and enactment processes.

New Directions for Evaluation
University of Newcastle Australia (AU), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.