Children’s Theory of Mind and Academic Achievement: a Meta-analysis on Reading Comprehension and Math Skills

Abstract Children’s theory of mind (ToM) is critical for academic success, yet its associations with reading comprehension and mathematics remain unclear. This pre-registered meta-analysis synthesizes findings from 53 studies, including 12,347 participants aged 2.5 – 17 years. Results revealed a significant overall association between ToM and academic achievement ( r = .32), which: (i) did not differ across domains (i.e., reading, mathematics, general achievement); (ii) was independent of verbal ability, non-verbal ability, executive function, and socioeconomic status; and (iii) appeared bidirectional. These longitudinal findings should be interpreted with caution, as they are largely based on zero-order associations without baseline controls. Sample (i.e., age, gender and country) and task characteristics (i.e., level of mentalizing, ToM stimulus type, mental state category, response type, and sensitivity to individual differences) did not moderate the relation between ToM and academic achievement, although weaker effects emerged in European samples. Our results demonstrate a consistent association between ToM and academic achievement underscoring the potential contribution of social–cognitive understanding to children’s academic development. Future research should clarify the mechanisms underlying this association, its domain specificity, and the direction of causal influence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10185-w
Primary Topic
Child and Animal Learning Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children’s Theory of Mind and Academic Achievement: a Meta-analysis on Reading Comprehension and Math Skills

Serena Lecce, Serena Maria Stagnitto, Sara Mascheretti, Valentina Lampis et al.
Educational Psychology Review
Child and Animal Learning Development
article

Children’s Theory of Mind and Academic Achievement: a Meta-analysis on Reading Comprehension and Math Skills

Serena Lecce, Serena Maria Stagnitto, Sara Mascheretti, Valentina Lampis, Rory T.; id_orcid 0000-0002-3710-7878 Devine
article en

Abstract

Abstract Children’s theory of mind (ToM) is critical for academic success, yet its associations with reading comprehension and mathematics remain unclear. This pre-registered meta-analysis synthesizes findings from 53 studies, including 12,347 participants aged 2.5 – 17 years. Results revealed a significant overall association between ToM and academic achievement ( r = .32), which: (i) did not differ across domains (i.e., reading, mathematics, general achievement); (ii) was independent of verbal ability, non-verbal ability, executive function, and socioeconomic status; and (iii) appeared bidirectional. These longitudinal findings should be interpreted with caution, as they are largely based on zero-order associations without baseline controls. Sample (i.e., age, gender and country) and task characteristics (i.e., level of mentalizing, ToM stimulus type, mental state category, response type, and sensitivity to individual differences) did not moderate the relation between ToM and academic achievement, although weaker effects emerged in European samples. Our results demonstrate a consistent association between ToM and academic achievement underscoring the potential contribution of social–cognitive understanding to children’s academic development. Future research should clarify the mechanisms underlying this association, its domain specificity, and the direction of causal influence.

Educational Psychology ReviewVol. 38(1)
University of Pavia (IT), University of Birmingham (GB)
Ministero della Salute, Università degli Studi di Pavia
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Child and Animal Learning Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.