Building an Onco-Hospitalist: Identifying Hospitalist Perceptions of Care Gaps for Inpatient Oncology Patients

BackgroundHospitalized patients with cancer face complex medical challenges, including longer stays, higher readmission rates, and increased in-hospital mortality. To address these needs, many institutions have adopted co-management models involving oncology-focused hospitalists ("onco-hospitalists") working alongside oncology specialists. While this model offers benefits, differences in training between hospitalists and oncologists can affect medical management, and divergent perspectives on prognosis and goals of care may stall interprofessional collaboration.MethodsAt our institution, hospitalists managing a dedicated inpatient oncology service reported increased stress and communication challenges. In response, a needs assessment evaluated hospitalist perceptions of these domains to inform targeted quality improvement efforts in the inpatient care of advanced cancer patients. Through structured discussions with oncologists, nurses, and palliative care providers, 3 key domains were identified: (1) Medical Management, (2) Patient Communication, and (3) Interprofessional Collaboration. Surveys were distributed to all hospitalists on the oncology service pre-intervention (n = 25).ResultsAmong all respondents (n = 19), confidence was high in pain and symptom management but lower in managing therapy side effects and basic oncologic pharmacology. Confidence in communication was high in breaking bad news and general goals-of-care discussions but lower for discussing the radiation oncology process or when asked about prognosis by the patient or family. Strong collaboration was noted with nursing, case management, pharmacy, and palliative care, but weaker with oncology and radiation oncology consultants.ConclusionThese results provide a clear framework for our institution in developing a strong novel onco-hospitalist program with goals to close knowledge gaps and enhance collaboration for improved patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091261454910
Primary Topic
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building an Onco-Hospitalist: Identifying Hospitalist Perceptions of Care Gaps for Inpatient Oncology Patients

Michael Rouse, Brice Zogleman, Natalia Roldán, Jennifer Fink
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
article

Building an Onco-Hospitalist: Identifying Hospitalist Perceptions of Care Gaps for Inpatient Oncology Patients

Michael Rouse, Brice Zogleman, Natalia Roldán, Jennifer Fink
article en

Abstract

BackgroundHospitalized patients with cancer face complex medical challenges, including longer stays, higher readmission rates, and increased in-hospital mortality. To address these needs, many institutions have adopted co-management models involving oncology-focused hospitalists ("onco-hospitalists") working alongside oncology specialists. While this model offers benefits, differences in training between hospitalists and oncologists can affect medical management, and divergent perspectives on prognosis and goals of care may stall interprofessional collaboration.MethodsAt our institution, hospitalists managing a dedicated inpatient oncology service reported increased stress and communication challenges. In response, a needs assessment evaluated hospitalist perceptions of these domains to inform targeted quality improvement efforts in the inpatient care of advanced cancer patients. Through structured discussions with oncologists, nurses, and palliative care providers, 3 key domains were identified: (1) Medical Management, (2) Patient Communication, and (3) Interprofessional Collaboration. Surveys were distributed to all hospitalists on the oncology service pre-intervention (n = 25).ResultsAmong all respondents (n = 19), confidence was high in pain and symptom management but lower in managing therapy side effects and basic oncologic pharmacology. Confidence in communication was high in breaking bad news and general goals-of-care discussions but lower for discussing the radiation oncology process or when asked about prognosis by the patient or family. Strong collaboration was noted with nursing, case management, pharmacy, and palliative care, but weaker with oncology and radiation oncology consultants.ConclusionThese results provide a clear framework for our institution in developing a strong novel onco-hospitalist program with goals to close knowledge gaps and enhance collaboration for improved patient care.

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
University of Kansas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.