Composability Creates Its Own Integrity Problem: Integrity and Answerability Conditions for Tokenised Wholesale Markets

This paper is technology-neutral and is not an argument against composability; it accepts the composable design and specifies the conditions under which such an ecosystem can be relied upon. It is intended to serve two purposes: as the governance companion to the composability proposal of Hunt and Whyman, and as the basis of a response to the joint Call for Input on the future of tokenisation issued by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Bank of England on 18 May 2026. Composability is not only a technical design choice; it is a relocation of market reliance. Reconstructing financial instruments from a common, reusable grammar of title and entitlement tokens moves the basis of reliance out of asset-specific silos and into shared, self-executing components. That relocation does not remove risk; it relocates it. Once instruments are assembled from shared components, the reliability of the whole ecosystem depends on the integrity of those components, the authority under which they self-execute, and the contestability of the mappings between token-state and legal or economic entitlement. This paper specifies the governance layer that the leading UK composability proposal expressly defers. It sets out four integrity conditions — data, system, epistemic and mandate integrity — for composable infrastructure; it argues that such infrastructure can ‘fail without crashing’, remaining available and immutable while the meaning relied upon has degraded; it proposes a ‘mandate envelope’ that extends, rather than replaces, the entitlement-token grammar, so that self-execution remains bounded by authority; and it sets out a minimum integrity-and-answerability framework, anchored in existing UK regulatory instruments, specifying the conditions under which participants, regulators, central counterparties, custodians, courts and investors may rely on a tokenised representation. The argument is offered as the governance companion to the composability proposal and as a contribution to the Call for Input issued by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Bank of England on 18 May 2026.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20459412
Primary Topic
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Composability Creates Its Own Integrity Problem: Integrity and Answerability Conditions for Tokenised Wholesale Markets

Peter Kahl
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
article

Composability Creates Its Own Integrity Problem: Integrity and Answerability Conditions for Tokenised Wholesale Markets

Peter Kahl
article en

Abstract

This paper is technology-neutral and is not an argument against composability; it accepts the composable design and specifies the conditions under which such an ecosystem can be relied upon. It is intended to serve two purposes: as the governance companion to the composability proposal of Hunt and Whyman, and as the basis of a response to the joint Call for Input on the future of tokenisation issued by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Bank of England on 18 May 2026. Composability is not only a technical design choice; it is a relocation of market reliance. Reconstructing financial instruments from a common, reusable grammar of title and entitlement tokens moves the basis of reliance out of asset-specific silos and into shared, self-executing components. That relocation does not remove risk; it relocates it. Once instruments are assembled from shared components, the reliability of the whole ecosystem depends on the integrity of those components, the authority under which they self-execute, and the contestability of the mappings between token-state and legal or economic entitlement. This paper specifies the governance layer that the leading UK composability proposal expressly defers. It sets out four integrity conditions — data, system, epistemic and mandate integrity — for composable infrastructure; it argues that such infrastructure can ‘fail without crashing’, remaining available and immutable while the meaning relied upon has degraded; it proposes a ‘mandate envelope’ that extends, rather than replaces, the entitlement-token grammar, so that self-execution remains bounded by authority; and it sets out a minimum integrity-and-answerability framework, anchored in existing UK regulatory instruments, specifying the conditions under which participants, regulators, central counterparties, custodians, courts and investors may rely on a tokenised representation. The argument is offered as the governance companion to the composability proposal and as a contribution to the Call for Input issued by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Bank of England on 18 May 2026.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Lexmark (United States) (US), Lexicon Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.