Wearable Data in Epilepsy Care

Seizure monitoring by combined diary and wearable data: A multicenter, longitudinal, observational study. Vieluf S, Tomioka S, Zhang B, Krishnan V, Bosl WJ, Grinnell T, Loddenkemper T. Epilepsia . 2025 Nov;66(11):4259–4271. doi:10.1111/epi.18550. Epub 2025 Jul 12. PMID: 40650883. Objective: In patients with intractable epilepsy, accurate diaries of seizure occurrence and timing can substantially inform management. Wearable devices that provide confirmation of seizure occurrence complement such diaries, which are frequently incomplete and/or inaccurate. Here, we combined seizure diaries and longitudinally deployed wrist-worn device recordings to evaluate whether wearable recordings contain information that can discriminate between days containing seizure-related activity and those without. Methods: Patients with focal seizures were prospectively enrolled in a clinical trial to test the effectiveness of eslicarbazepine acetate as an adjunct to levetiracetam or lamotrigine (phase IV clinical trial NCT03116828). One hundred two patients maintained a seizure diary and wore a biosensor for >30 weeks. Based on diaries, we labeled days as either “seizure” versus “no-seizure” or “preseizure” versus “no-preseizure.” We compared patterns obtained by harmonic 24-h modeling between conditions. Best-ranking wearable markers and seizure diary variables were fed into a fully connected neural network, with several hidden layers and depth as hyperparameters that classified between seizure day conditions. Results: The final sample contained 70 patients (median age = 42.5 years, 43 female) with 5437 recorded patient-days, including 557 seizure days and 537 preseizure days. Twenty-four- hour patterns in electrodermal activity and accelerometry differentiated no-seizure versus seizure days, as well as no-preseizure versus preseizure days ( p < .01). Classification between no-seizure and seizure days (weighted F1 = .81, sensitivity = .82, specificity = .67) as well as between no-preseizure and preseizure days (weighted F1 = .82, sensitivity = .80, specificity = .66) revealed good performance. Significance: Wearable data capture seizure-related differences with daily resolution, differentiating between days with lower and higher seizure susceptibility. Combining diary-based clinical and wearable data bears the potential for developing a dynamic seizure detection and prediction system with daily resolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epiliepsy currents/Epilepsy currents
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15357597261433585
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wearable Data in Epilepsy Care

Gewalin Aungaroon
Epiliepsy currents/Epilepsy currents
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Wearable Data in Epilepsy Care

Gewalin Aungaroon
article en

Abstract

Seizure monitoring by combined diary and wearable data: A multicenter, longitudinal, observational study. Vieluf S, Tomioka S, Zhang B, Krishnan V, Bosl WJ, Grinnell T, Loddenkemper T. Epilepsia . 2025 Nov;66(11):4259–4271. doi:10.1111/epi.18550. Epub 2025 Jul 12. PMID: 40650883. Objective: In patients with intractable epilepsy, accurate diaries of seizure occurrence and timing can substantially inform management. Wearable devices that provide confirmation of seizure occurrence complement such diaries, which are frequently incomplete and/or inaccurate. Here, we combined seizure diaries and longitudinally deployed wrist-worn device recordings to evaluate whether wearable recordings contain information that can discriminate between days containing seizure-related activity and those without. Methods: Patients with focal seizures were prospectively enrolled in a clinical trial to test the effectiveness of eslicarbazepine acetate as an adjunct to levetiracetam or lamotrigine (phase IV clinical trial NCT03116828). One hundred two patients maintained a seizure diary and wore a biosensor for >30 weeks. Based on diaries, we labeled days as either “seizure” versus “no-seizure” or “preseizure” versus “no-preseizure.” We compared patterns obtained by harmonic 24-h modeling between conditions. Best-ranking wearable markers and seizure diary variables were fed into a fully connected neural network, with several hidden layers and depth as hyperparameters that classified between seizure day conditions. Results: The final sample contained 70 patients (median age = 42.5 years, 43 female) with 5437 recorded patient-days, including 557 seizure days and 537 preseizure days. Twenty-four- hour patterns in electrodermal activity and accelerometry differentiated no-seizure versus seizure days, as well as no-preseizure versus preseizure days ( p < .01). Classification between no-seizure and seizure days (weighted F1 = .81, sensitivity = .82, specificity = .67) as well as between no-preseizure and preseizure days (weighted F1 = .82, sensitivity = .80, specificity = .66) revealed good performance. Significance: Wearable data capture seizure-related differences with daily resolution, differentiating between days with lower and higher seizure susceptibility. Combining diary-based clinical and wearable data bears the potential for developing a dynamic seizure detection and prediction system with daily resolution.

Epiliepsy currents/Epilepsy currents
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.