Consequences of Periprosthetic Fracture After Hemiarthroplasty of the Hip

Introduction Low-energy femoral neck fracture (FNF) in the elderly is a serious injury. For patients with multiple existing comorbidities and frailty, the risk of complications, poor functional outcomes, and premature death may be higher. The treatment aims for immediate weight-bearing, preferably by hemiarthroplasty (HA). Previous research has focused on prosthetic joint infection and dislocation after HA. In this study, we aimed to describe the possible surgical consequences of periprosthetic fracture after HA. Methods HA patients with a periprosthetic fracture occurring between 2009 and 2019 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were identified using local quality registers and systematic searches of the patient administrative system. Results We identified 56 periprosthetic fractures. A total of nine patients (16%) experienced complications related to the fracture. Of these, 42 patients were treated surgically for the periprosthetic fracture, and four patients required additional surgeries. Three of these four reoperated patients underwent two further operations, while one patient had a single reoperation. Within three months after surgery, three patients had died. Seventeen of the 56 patients (30%) required a permanently higher level of care after the periprosthetic fracture, and we observed an increased risk of new long-term care admissions (odds ratio (OR): 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-4.2; p = 0.04). The 30-day mortality rate was 7%, and the one-year mortality rate was 27%. Most patients were treated surgically for their periprosthetic fractures. Regardless of treatment, 16% of patients experienced surgically related complications. Among the operated patients, 10% required additional surgical procedures. Nearly one-third of patients ultimately needed a permanently higher level of care following the injury. Conclusions In our cohort, we observed a low number of surgical complications, and only a few patients required reoperations. However, about one-third of the patients ultimately required a higher level of care.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.109920
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consequences of Periprosthetic Fracture After Hemiarthroplasty of the Hip

Wender Figved, Tom Tarjei Lian, Frede Frihagen, Stian E Svenøy
Cureus
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

Consequences of Periprosthetic Fracture After Hemiarthroplasty of the Hip

Wender Figved, Tom Tarjei Lian, Frede Frihagen, Stian E Svenøy
article en

Abstract

Introduction Low-energy femoral neck fracture (FNF) in the elderly is a serious injury. For patients with multiple existing comorbidities and frailty, the risk of complications, poor functional outcomes, and premature death may be higher. The treatment aims for immediate weight-bearing, preferably by hemiarthroplasty (HA). Previous research has focused on prosthetic joint infection and dislocation after HA. In this study, we aimed to describe the possible surgical consequences of periprosthetic fracture after HA. Methods HA patients with a periprosthetic fracture occurring between 2009 and 2019 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were identified using local quality registers and systematic searches of the patient administrative system. Results We identified 56 periprosthetic fractures. A total of nine patients (16%) experienced complications related to the fracture. Of these, 42 patients were treated surgically for the periprosthetic fracture, and four patients required additional surgeries. Three of these four reoperated patients underwent two further operations, while one patient had a single reoperation. Within three months after surgery, three patients had died. Seventeen of the 56 patients (30%) required a permanently higher level of care after the periprosthetic fracture, and we observed an increased risk of new long-term care admissions (odds ratio (OR): 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-4.2; p = 0.04). The 30-day mortality rate was 7%, and the one-year mortality rate was 27%. Most patients were treated surgically for their periprosthetic fractures. Regardless of treatment, 16% of patients experienced surgically related complications. Among the operated patients, 10% required additional surgical procedures. Nearly one-third of patients ultimately needed a permanently higher level of care following the injury. Conclusions In our cohort, we observed a low number of surgical complications, and only a few patients required reoperations. However, about one-third of the patients ultimately required a higher level of care.

Cureus
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.